Letters Continuity in general practice BMJ 2001; 322 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7288.737 (Published 24 March 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;322:737 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles General Practice Does continuity in general practice really matter?Commentary: A patient's perspective of continuity Published: 23 September 2000; BMJ 321 doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7263.734 See more John Launer: Doctors as activists BMJ April 24, 2024, 385 q939; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q939 Helen Salisbury: Sick notes and a national illness service BMJ April 23, 2024, 385 q918; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q918 Sunak is accused of “harmful” rhetoric amid plans to remove sick note responsibility from GPs BMJ April 19, 2024, 385 q914; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q914 GPs enter dispute with NHS England over contract imposition BMJ April 18, 2024, 385 q904; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q904 Partha Kar: We need to level up all staff, not level down doctors BMJ April 18, 2024, 385 q892; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q892 Cited by... Early growth and coronary heart disease in later life: longitudinal studyAbstract Fulltext