Intended for healthcare professionals

Rapid response to:

News

Evidence is insufficient to back mandatory NHS staff vaccination, says House of Lords committee

BMJ 2021; 375 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2957 (Published 03 December 2021) Cite this as: BMJ 2021;375:n2957

Read our latest coverage of the coronavirus pandemic

Rapid Response:

Re: Evidence is insufficient to back mandatory NHS staff vaccination, says House of Lords committee

Dear Editor

As a Muslim believer and as a medical doctor, I would like to fully support Joanna Moncrieff et al in their response on 13 Dec: Evidence does not justify Mandatory vaccines...., where they put​ many good reasons in their argument to oppose mandatory vaccines.

Also, the strong argument against Mandatory vaccines was put eloquently by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee in the House of Lords.

I would like to add:

Muslim believers do oppose too forcibly medicating a person according to Muslim Islamic rulings (FATAWAS) in the Muslim world.

There are a lot of references for this ruling in many languages in different Muslim countries (see below a sample two references).

This human right is granted to every Muslim believer and every practising Muslim in the world including Muslim doctors, Muslim nurses and Muslim patients in the UK and in the world.
So, for Islamic reasons: a practising Muslim cannot accept at all any mandatory vaccine.

What is amazing in this ruling is the right to refuse any mandatory medicine even when the medicine itself is surely permissible (halal) safe and effective!

DR MAJID KATME
Retired medical doctor
Ex-President :Islamic Medical Association/UK

Ref:
- Islam Question and Answer islamqa.info
- abukhadeejah.com

Competing interests: No competing interests

20 December 2021
MAJID Katme
retired medical doctor
London