Feature
Evidence Based Medicine
Why we can’t trust clinical guidelines
BMJ 2013; 346 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f3830 (Published 14 June 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f3830
Related articles
- Correction Published: 19 June 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f3998
- Editor's Choice Published: 19 June 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f3980
- Editor's Choice Published: 21 June 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f4003
- Editor's Choice Published: 04 September 2013; BMJ 347 doi:10.1136/bmj.f5427
- Feature Published: 17 September 2013; BMJ 347 doi:10.1136/bmj.f5535
- Analysis Published: 13 June 2014; BMJ 348 doi:10.1136/bmj.g3725
- Letter Published: 30 July 2013; BMJ 347 doi:10.1136/bmj.f4771
- Letter Published: 04 September 2013; BMJ 347 doi:10.1136/bmj.f5322
- Letter Published: 04 September 2013; BMJ 347 doi:10.1136/bmj.f5324
- Letter Published: 10 September 2013; BMJ 347 doi:10.1136/bmj.f5508
- Letter Published: 06 January 2014; BMJ 348 doi:10.1136/bmj.f7699
- Letter Published: 30 June 2015; BMJ 350 doi:10.1136/bmj.h3505
- Editorial Published: 11 October 2011; BMJ 343 doi:10.1136/bmj.d5728
- Education And Debate Published: 23 March 2002; BMJ 324 doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7339.723
See more
- John Launer: Doctors as activistsBMJ April 24, 2024, 385 q939; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q939
- Medicine is designed for righthanded peopleBMJ April 24, 2024, 385 q933; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q933
- Helen Salisbury: Sick notes and a national illness serviceBMJ April 23, 2024, 385 q918; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q918
- Sunak is accused of “harmful” rhetoric amid plans to remove sick note responsibility from GPsBMJ April 19, 2024, 385 q914; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q914
- GPs enter dispute with NHS England over contract impositionBMJ April 18, 2024, 385 q904; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q904
Cited by...
- Knowledge and use of evidence-based medicine in daily practice by health professionals: a cross-sectional survey
- Overtesting and undertesting in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- When is a guideline not a guideline? The devil is in the details
- "Standard Care" in Cancer Clinical Trials: An Analysis of Care Provided to Women in the Control Arms of Breast Cancer Clinical Trials
- Evidence based medicine manifesto for better healthcare: A response to systematic bias, wastage, error and fraud in research underpinning patient care
- Quality of clinical practice guidelines in delirium: a systematic appraisal
- Productivity of authors in the field of diabetes: bibliographic analysis of trial publications
- Diverting attention from financial conflicts of interest
- In brief
- Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis?
- Guidelines: is bigger better? A review of SIGN guidelines
- SIGN should be transparent about competing interests in all current guidelines
- SIGN's reply to Gordon and Gordon
- Editor's reply to Smith
- La medecine fondee sur des donnees probantes est-elle surestimee en medecine familiale?: Non.
- Is evidence-based medicine overrated in family medicine?: No.
- Ensuring the integrity of clinical practice guidelines: a tool for protecting patients
- Repeated meta-analyses are both worthy and to be encouraged
- Author's reply to Messe and colleagues
- American Academy of Neurology replies to Jeanne Lenzer
- NICE accredits guidelines using international AGREE criteria