BMJ  2007;334:221-222 (3 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39108.396852.1F

Letters

Semantics

Schizophrenia can and should be renamed

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Lieberman and First make the case against renaming schizophrenia on the grounds that changing the term would not change the stigma attached to the underlying condition.¹ Yet renaming is a key strategy used by marketing and public relations industries to improve image, alongside attitude change and education.

But what should it be replaced with? One of the conclusions emerging from the "Deconstructing psychosis" conference, part of the DSM-V Prelude project was for replacing the current categories with a general psychosis syndrome.² However, this would increase still further the heterogeneity that currently bedevils biological and psychosocial research, clinical practice, and resource management, when differentiation is really needed.

Trauma has recently been recognised as relevant to a significant group of patients with this diagnosis.³ Since the 1950s, a new group has also been included to broaden the diagnosis further: those in whom there is an association with hallucinogenic drugs.⁴ Renaming and differentiation . . . [Full text of this article]

¹ University of Southampton, Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton SO14 0YG, ² Hampshire Partnership Trust, Southampton SO40 2RZ, ³ Hampshire Partnership NHS Trust, Tadley RG26 3HX

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Renaming schizophrenia

Jeffrey A Lieberman and Michael B First
BMJ 2007 334: 108. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

"Renaming" a panacea for stigma associated with mental illness...

Rajeev Krishnadas
bmj.com, 5 Feb 2007 [Full text]

Not Just Semantics

Mark Agius, et al.
bmj.com, 7 Feb 2007 [Full text]

May be a good start

Manfred Meister
bmj.com, 13 Feb 2007 [Full text]