Intended for healthcare professionals

Rapid response to:

Editorials

Corticosteroid injection for rotator cuff disease

BMJ 2009; 338 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a2599 (Published 23 January 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:a2599

Rapid Response:

thanks

Many thanks for the response from Professor Koes.

The problem is that even if the statistically significant difference
in secondary outcome measures is not of importance, there are several
other problems which limit the significance of this study.

As the study admits the lack of a sham arm is a disadvantage. The
lack of a specific diagnosis for the patienst in the study is also a
concern; 'rotator cuff disease' is not a widely used description and does
not represent a specific shoulder pathology. When this non-specificity is
combined with the relatively small trial numbers and a treatment that may
only be slightly more efficacious, then you have the ingredients to find
less of significance than may potentially be found if things were designed
differently.

Competing interests:
None declared

Competing interests: No competing interests

06 February 2009
Benjamin Dean
st2
oxford