Intended for healthcare professionals

Rapid response to:

News

Scientists want more protection after government adviser is sacked

BMJ 2009; 339 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4563 (Published 04 November 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b4563

Rapid Response:

Naive not to expect a backlash

In areas such as crime, policing, drug abuse, animal research, areas
covered by the UK Home Office are very susceptible to evidence being
overridden. I think relations between top scientists & government have
improved greatly, no one should squander the gains now. I remember when the
BSE crisis started, Sir Richard Southwood's committee looking into mad cow
disease were not able to disclose its existence. A new conservative
government worries me when Chris Grayling, shadow Home Secretary, backed Mr
Johnson. More right-wing Tory MPs may force an about turn on embryo
research & climate change. President Obama has put science at the
heart of his administration & protects whistle-blowers. I hope the
government signs up to the "Principles for the treatment of Independent
Scientific Advice", then both can rebuild confidence. I believe the Labour
Government has done a lot for basic research in particular getting
scientific advice into Whitehall. Don't act in haste, start again.

Competing interests:
None declared

Competing interests: No competing interests

13 November 2009
Carl Curtis
Registered Nurse Southwark NHS
SE17