Intended for healthcare professionals

Rapid response to:

Practice Guidelines

Prevention and treatment of surgical site infection: summary of NICE guidance

BMJ 2008; 337 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1924 (Published 28 October 2008) Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1924

Rapid Response:

Lost in Translation

Publication of new NICE guidelines frequently generate discussion, so
as a surgical team we read and debated with interest the recent article
summarising NICE guidelines in the prevention and treatment of surgical
site infection (1). Among many recommendations the article advised ‘Do not
use diathermy for surgical incision to reduce the risk of surgical site
infection.’ This statement appeared to suggest we should change our
practice and stop using the finger-switch diathermy.

We are keen to follow evidence based guidelines so we referred back
to the source (the published NICE guidelines) where the situation became
clear – there was no evidence that either carried a higher risk of wound
infection, but this advice seemed lost in translation. Now we understand
this guidance, we urge others to look at the data from the source, debate,
discuss and share this information, and reach for either your knife or
diathermy without apprehension.

Elizabeth Clayton MBBS, BMed. Sci, MRCS (Eng), MSc (Dist.)
Specialist Registrar

Caroline George MBBS BSc Foundation Year 1 Doctor

Neil Smith MA (Oxon), MBBS FRCS (Gen Surg.) Consultant General
Surgeon

General Surgical Department
East Surrey Hospital, Surrey & Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust.

1.Prevention and treatment of surgical site infection: summary of
NICE guidance.
Leaper D, Burman-Roy S, Palanca A, Cullen K, Worster D, Gautam-Aitken E,
Whittle M; Guideline Development Group.
BMJ. 2008 Oct 28;337:a1924.

Competing interests:
None declared

Competing interests: No competing interests

09 December 2008
Elizabeth S J Clayton
General Surgical Registrar
Caroline George and Neil Smith
East Surrey Hospital