Brian Kaplan refers to ‘incontrovertible evidence’. There is no such
thing as incontrovertible evidence. Appeals to ‘incontrovertible evidence’
or ‘scientific proof’ are characteristic features of non-scientists. They
are faith positions, and have no overlap with science. I think failure to
see this distinction is at the root of the homeopathy debate.
Rapid Response:
Homeopathy and faith
Brian Kaplan refers to ‘incontrovertible evidence’. There is no such
thing as incontrovertible evidence. Appeals to ‘incontrovertible evidence’
or ‘scientific proof’ are characteristic features of non-scientists. They
are faith positions, and have no overlap with science. I think failure to
see this distinction is at the root of the homeopathy debate.
Competing interests:
Freelance medical writer
Competing interests: No competing interests