Could Michael F Vagg qualify his statement "acupuncture (for which
there is no rational scientific basis......)" as it is at odds with
multitudinous published research, global demonstrations and anecdote
amongst billions of peoples, empirically derived (and recorded in
classical texts) evidence over millennia, and World Health Organisation
assessments and subsequent recommendations for more than 30 years?
Regards
John H.
Competing interests:
Traditional Chinese Medicine Specialist
Rapid Response:
Re: Not accurate
Could Michael F Vagg qualify his statement "acupuncture (for which
there is no rational scientific basis......)" as it is at odds with
multitudinous published research, global demonstrations and anecdote
amongst billions of peoples, empirically derived (and recorded in
classical texts) evidence over millennia, and World Health Organisation
assessments and subsequent recommendations for more than 30 years?
Regards
John H.
Competing interests:
Traditional Chinese Medicine Specialist
Competing interests: No competing interests