In
Drs. Marshall and Flyvbjerg’s review of diabetes treatment1 one of
their major points was pharmaceutical lowering of blood lipids. No doubt statin treatment may reduce the risk of
cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients, but the absolute effect is small; in secondary prevention less than 6 % and in primary prevention less than 2 %.2 Crucial is also
that no significant effect has been seen on total mortality and the question is
therefore if the small reductionof
non-fatal events is sufficient to balance the risks of side effects. Of
particular interest for diabetic patients is peripheral neuropathy. According to a large population study the odds ratio for that risk in
patients treated with statins for longer than two years was 26.4 (17.8-45.4).3
Other researchers found polyneuropathy in five of 50 cardiology clinic patients
after 28 months of statin treatment.4 Most likely the risk is larger
in diabetic patients and such symptoms may be seen as a complication to the
primary disease and not to the treatment preventing their alleviation by
discontinuation of the drug.
The authors also stressed the importance of reducing
total and LDL-cholesterol below a certain level. This advice is not supported by
scientific evidence. Several studies have shown that high cholesterol is not a
risk factor in diabetic patients,5-7 and no statin trial has shown
association between baseline total or LDL-cholesterol, or between individual
degree of cholesterol lowering, and outcome8 indicating that the
benefit from the statins has nothing to do with cholesterol lowering. To govern
statin treatment by its effect on the blood lipids is therefore meaningless. Also
surprising is that the authors´ only dietary advice was to “eat healthily”
referring to a multifactorial trial that included a low-fat diet ignoring the
promising results from a steadily increasing number of succesful, controlled
low-carbohydrate trials. A general finding from these experiments is that a
low-carb diet is more effective for weight reduction than a low-fat diet,9-10
most of all in overweight patients with decreased insulin sensitivity.11
A reduction of dietary carbohydrates also leads to a substantial lowering ofHbA1c and improvement of insulin sensitivity.9-12
As a consequence many patients with type 2 diabetes were able to stop or reduce
their antidiabetic treatment. Most interesting is that in spite of high intakes
of saturated fat no adverse effects on serum lipids were seen. On the contrary
HDL-cholesterol increased in some of the trials and in all of them triglycerides
went down substantially.
A common argument against the lowcarb diet is that we
have not yet tested its effect on hard end-points in long-term, unifactorial
trials. True, but the lowfat diets have been tested that way and have failed.13
Considering the many short-term benefits on important risk factors a lowcarb
diet appears at least as a promising alternative when other treatments have
failed.
Marshall SM, Flyvbjerg A. Prevention
and early detection of vascular complications of diabetes. BMJ
2006;333:475-80.
Costa J, Borges M, David C, Vaz Carneiro A. Efficacy
of lipid lowering drug treatment for diabetic and non-diabetic patients:
meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ
2006;332:1115-24.
Gaist
D, Jeppesen U, Andersen M, Garcia Rodriguez LA, Hallas J, Sindrup SH.
Statins and risk of polyneuropathy: a case-control study. Neurology
2002;58:1333-7.
Langsjoen PH, Langsjoen JO, Langsjoen AM, Lucas LA.
Treatment of statin adverse effects with supplemental Coenzyme Q10 and
statin drug discontinuation. BioFactors 2005;25:147–52.
Fontbonne A, Eschwege E, Cambien F, Richard JL,
Ducimetiere P, Thibult N et al. Hypertriglyceridaemia as a risk factor of coronary heart disease
mortality in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes. Results
from the 11-year follow-up of the Paris Prospective Study. Diabetologia
1989;32:300-4.
Laakso M, Lehto S, Penttila I, Pyorala K. Lipids
and lipoproteins predicting coronary heart disease mortality and morbidity
in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Circulation
1993;88:1421-30.
Liu J,
Sempos C, Donahue RP, Dorn J, Trevisan M, Grundy SM. Joint
distribution of non-HDL and LDL cholesterol and coronary heart disease risk
prediction among individuals with and without diabetes. Diabetes
Care
2005;28:1916-21.
Ravnskov U. Is atherosclerosis caused by high
cholesterol? QJM2002; 95: 397-403.
Arora SK,
McFarlane SI. The
case for low carbohydrate diets in diabetes management. Nutr
Metab 2005;2:16-24.
Yancy WS Jr, Foy M, Chalecki AM,
Vernon MC, Westman EC. A low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet to treat type 2
diabetes. Nutr Metab 2005;2:34-40.
Cornier
MA, Donahoo WT, Pereira R, Gurevich I, Westergren R, Enerback S et al.
Insulin sensitivity determines the effectiveness of dietary macronutrient
composition on weight loss in obese women. Obes Res 2005;13:703-9.
Gannon MC, Nuttall FQ. Control
of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes without weight loss by modification of
diet composition. Nutr
Metab 2006;3:16-23.
Ravnskov U. The questionable role of saturated and
polyunsaturated fatty acids in cardiovascular disease. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:443-60.
Rapid Response:
Unsupported guidelines
In
Drs. Marshall and Flyvbjerg’s review of diabetes treatment1 one of
their major points was pharmaceutical lowering of
blood lipids. No doubt statin treatment may reduce the risk of
cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients, but the
absolute effect is small; in secondary prevention less than
6 % and in primary prevention less than 2 %.2 Crucial is also
that no significant effect has been seen on total mortality and the question is
therefore if the small reduction of
non-fatal events is sufficient to balance the risks of side effects. Of
particular interest for diabetic patients is peripheral neuropathy.
According to a large population study the odds ratio for that risk in
patients treated with statins for longer than two years was 26.4 (17.8-45.4).3
Other researchers found polyneuropathy in five of 50 cardiology clinic patients
after 28 months of statin treatment.4 Most likely the risk is larger
in diabetic patients and such symptoms may be seen as a complication to the
primary disease and not to the treatment preventing their alleviation by
discontinuation of the drug.
The authors also stressed the importance of reducing
total and LDL-cholesterol below a certain level. This advice is not supported by
scientific evidence. Several studies have shown that high cholesterol is not a
risk factor in diabetic patients,5-7 and no statin trial has shown
association between baseline total or LDL-cholesterol, or between individual
degree of cholesterol lowering, and outcome8 indicating that the
benefit from the statins has nothing to do with cholesterol lowering. To govern
statin treatment by its effect on the blood lipids is therefore meaningless.
Also
surprising is that the authors´ only dietary advice was to “eat healthily”
referring to a multifactorial trial that included a low-fat diet ignoring the
promising results from a steadily increasing number of succesful, controlled
low-carbohydrate trials. A general finding from these experiments is that a
low-carb diet is more effective for weight reduction than a low-fat diet,9-10
most of all in overweight patients with decreased insulin sensitivity.11
A reduction of dietary carbohydrates also leads to a substantial lowering of HbA1c and improvement of insulin sensitivity.9-12
As a consequence many patients with type 2 diabetes were able to stop or reduce
their antidiabetic treatment. Most interesting is that in spite of high intakes
of saturated fat no adverse effects on serum lipids were seen. On the contrary
HDL-cholesterol increased in some of the trials and in all of them triglycerides
went down substantially.
A common argument against the lowcarb diet is that we
have not yet tested its effect on hard end-points in long-term, unifactorial
trials. True, but the lowfat diets have been tested that way and have failed.13
Considering the many short-term benefits on important risk factors a lowcarb
diet appears at least as a promising alternative when other treatments have
failed.
and early detection of vascular complications of diabetes. BMJ
2006;333:475-80.
of lipid lowering drug treatment for diabetic and non-diabetic patients:
meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ
2006;332:1115-24.
D, Jeppesen U, Andersen M, Garcia Rodriguez LA, Hallas J, Sindrup SH.
Statins and risk of polyneuropathy: a case-control study. Neurology
2002;58:1333-7.
Treatment of statin adverse effects with supplemental Coenzyme Q10 and
statin drug discontinuation. BioFactors 2005;25:147–52.
Ducimetiere P, Thibult N et al. Hypertriglyceridaemia as a risk factor of coronary heart disease
mortality in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes. Results
from the 11-year follow-up of the Paris Prospective Study. Diabetologia
1989;32:300-4.
and lipoproteins predicting coronary heart disease mortality and morbidity
in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Circulation
1993;88:1421-30.
Sempos C, Donahue RP, Dorn J, Trevisan M, Grundy SM. Joint
distribution of non-HDL and LDL cholesterol and coronary heart disease risk
prediction among individuals with and without diabetes. Diabetes
Care
2005;28:1916-21.
cholesterol? QJM2002; 95: 397-403.
McFarlane SI. The
case for low carbohydrate diets in diabetes management. Nutr
Metab 2005;2:16-24.
Vernon MC, Westman EC. A low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet to treat type 2
diabetes. Nutr Metab 2005;2:34-40.
MA, Donahoo WT, Pereira R, Gurevich I, Westergren R, Enerback S et al.
Insulin sensitivity determines the effectiveness of dietary macronutrient
composition on weight loss in obese women.
Obes Res 2005;13:703-9.
of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes without weight loss by modification of
diet composition. Nutr
Metab 2006;3:16-23.
polyunsaturated fatty acids in cardiovascular disease. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:443-60.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests