Abstract
We assessed the reading habits of internists with and without epidemiological training because such information may help guide medical journals as they make changes in how articles are edited and formatted. In a 1998 national self-administered mailed survey of 143 internists with fellowship training in epidemiology and study design and a random sample of 121 internists from the American Medical Association physician master file, we asked about the number of hours spent reading medical journals per week and the percentage of articles for which only the abstract is read. Respondents also were asked which of nine medical journals they subscribe to and read regularly. Of the 399 eligible participants, 264 returned surveys (response rate 66%). Respondents reported spending 4.4 hours per week reading medical journal articles and reported reading only the abstract for 63% of the articles; these findings were similar for internists with and without epidemiology training. Respondents admitted to a reliance on journal editors to provide rigorous and useful information, given the limited time available for critical reading. We conclude that internists, regardless of training in epidemiology, rely heavily on abstracts and prescreening of articles by editors.
References
Christakis DA, Saint S, Saha S, et al. Do physicians judge a study by its cover? An investigation of journal attribution bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:773–8.
Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Fitzgerald D, Guyatt GH, Walker CJ, Sackett DL. How to deep up with the medical literature: IV. Using the literature to solve clinical problems. Ann Intern Med. 1986;105:636–40.
Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Fitzgerald D, Guyatt GH, Walker CJ, Sackett DL. How to keep up with the medical literature: II. Deciding which journals to read regularly. Ann Intern Med. 1986;105:309–12.
Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Fitzgerald D, Guyatt GH, Walker CJ, Sackett DL. How to keep up with the medical literature: I. Why try to keep up and how to get started. Ann Intern Med. 1986;105:149–53.
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312:71–2.
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM. On the need for evidence-based medicine. J Public Health Med. 1995;17:330–4.
Bordley DR, Fagan M, Theige D. Evidence-based medicine: a powerful educational tool for clerkship education. Am J Med. 1997;102:427–32.
Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1994;271:703–7.
Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH. Users’ guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1993;270:2093–5.
Guyatt GH, Rennie D. Users’ guides to the medical literature. JAMA. 1993;270:2096–7. Editorial.
Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. Users’ guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. What were the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1994;271:59–63.
Stinson ER, Mueller DA. Survey of health professionals’ information habits and needs conducted through personal interviews. JAMA. 1980;243:140–3.
Stross JK, Harlan WR. The impact of mandatory continuing medical education. JAMA. 1978;239:2663–6.
Stross JK, Harlan WR. The dissemination of new medical information. JAMA. 1979;241:2622–4.
Winkler JD, Berry SH, Brook RH, Kanouse DE. Physicians’ Attitudes and Information Habits. In: Kanouse DE, Winkler JD, Kosecoff J, et al., eds. Changing Medical Practice Through Technology Assessment: An Evaluation of the NIH Consensus Development Program. Ann Arbor, Mich: Health Administration Press; 1989:87–101.
Justice AC, Berlin JA, Fletcher SW, Fletcher RH, Goodman SN. Do readers and peer reviewers agree on manuscript quality? JAMA. 1994;272:117–9.
Pitkin RM, Branagan MA, Burmeister LF. Accuracy of data in abstracts of published research articles. JAMA. 1999;281:1110–1.
Taddio A, Pain T, Fassos FF, Boon H, Ilersich AL, Einarson TR. Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association. CMAJ. 1994;150:1611–5.
Pitkin RM, Branagan MA. Can the accuracy of abstracts be improved by providing specific instructions? A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998;280:267–9.
Winker MA. The need for concrete improvement in abstract quality. JAMA. 1999;281:1129–30.Editorial.
Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1129–36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by the University of Washington Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program and the Department of Veterans Affairs. Drs. Christakis and Elmore are supported by Robert Wood Johnson Generalist Faculty Awards. Drs. Saint, Christakis, and Saha were Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars at the time this work was conducted.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saint, S., Christakis, D.A., Saha, S. et al. Journal reading habits of internists. J GEN INTERN MED 15, 881–884 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.00202.x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.00202.x