Abstract
Objective: To compare the mortality for women in Sweden, Norway and Denmark in order to search for clues for the low life expectancy of Danish women. Methods: Prospective age-period-cohort study covering 40 years for all Swedish, Norwegian and Danish women aged 40–84 during the period 1960–2000, and born 1900–1950. Outcome measures: Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals for deaths. Results: The high risk of dying among Danish women was associated with being born between the two World Wars, and that a similar pattern was not found for women in Norway and Sweden. A tendency of a cohort effect was observed for Swedish women born around 1940. Conclusions: The currently low life expectancy of Danish women compared with that of women in Norway and Sweden is partly a transitional phenomenon caused by excessive death rates for women born between the two World Wars. Data on smoking prevalence by birth cohort and age indicate that a high percentage of Danish women in these cohorts were smokers throughout their adult life.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
World Health Organisation. World Health Report 2001. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2001.
Jacobsen R, Keiding N, Lynge E. Long term mortality trends behind low life expectancy of Danish women. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 6: 205–208.
Danmarks Statistik. Befolkningens Bevægelser 1960–2000. Copenhagen: Danmarks Statistik, 2001.
Statistisk Sentralbyrå. Dødsårsaker - Hovedtabeller 1960–1996. Oslo: Statistisk Sentralbyrå, 1997.
Statistisk Sentralbyrå. Statistisk Årbok 1960–2001. Oslo: Statistisk Sentralbyrå, 1999.
Statistiska centralbyrån. Befolkningsstatistik Del 4: Födda och döda, civilståndsändringar 1991–2001, Stockholm: Statistiska centralbyrån, 2002.
Statistiska centralbyrån. Befolkningsförändringar Del 3: Hela riket och länen 1960–1990. Stockholm: Statistiska centralbyrån, 1991.
Holford TR. Analysing the temporal effects of age, period and cohort. Stat Methods Med Res 1992; 1: 317–337.
Robertson C, Boyle P. Age-period-cohort analysis of chronic disease rates. I: Modelling approach. Stat Med 1998; 17: 1305–1323.
Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical methods in cancer research, vol. 2, The design and analysis of cohort studies. Lyon: IARC Scientific Publications No. 82, 1987.
SAS. SAS/STAT Software: Changes and enhancements through release 6.11. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1996.
Hamtoft H, Lindhardt M. Tobacco consumption in Denmark. II. The Danish National Morbidity Survey of 1950. Communication No. 12, Danish Med Bull 1956; 3: 188–196.
Niels KrR, Margit VG, Søren RB, Mette M, Finn K-J. Sundhed og sygelighed i Danmark 1987. Copenhagen: DIKE, 1988.
Mette K, Niels KrR, Lis K, Hans Chr P, Gert AN. Sundhed og sygelighed i Danmark 1994 - og udviklingen siden 1987. Copenhagen: DIKE, 1991.
Rønneberg A, Hafstad A, Lund KE. Smoking habits since 1910 among Norwegian men and women born after 1890. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1994; 114: 1623–1626.
Nordlund LA. Trends in smoking habits and lung cancer in Sweden. Eur J Cancer Prev 1998; 7: 109–116.
Juel K. Increased mortality among Danish women: Population based register study. Br Med J 2000; 321: 349–350.
Danmarks Statistik, Befolkningsudvikling og Sundhedsforhold 1901–1960, Statistiske undersøgelser Nr. 19. Copenhagen: Danmarks Statistik, 1966.
Lynge E, Jensen OM. Cohort trends in incidence of cervical cancer in Denmark in relation to gonorrheal infection. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1985; 64: 291–296.
Sundhedsministeriet. Mortality in Denmark in the 1990s. Copenhagen: The Danish Ministry of Health, 1998.
Li X, Mutanen P, Hemminiki K. Gender-specific incidence trends in lung cancer by histological type in Sweden, 1958–1996. Eur J Cancer Prev 2001; 10: 227–235.
Life expectancy in Sweden 1991–2000, Demographic reports 2001:3, Statistics Sweden: Örebro, 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jacobsen, R., Von Euler, M., Osler, M. et al. Women's death in Scandinavia — what makes Denmark different?. Eur J Epidemiol 19, 117–121 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EJEP.0000017834.35943.bd
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EJEP.0000017834.35943.bd