Elsevier

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volume 91, Issue 5, May 2020, Pages 1027-1036.e9
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Systematic review and meta-analysis
High-definition colonoscopy for improving adenoma detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.052Get rights and content

Background and Aims

Previous meta-analysis showed marginal benefit of high-definition white-light endoscopy (HD-WLE) over standard-definition colonoscopy (SDC) for adenoma detection, but with residual uncertainty due to inclusion of nonrandomized studies. We aimed to further assess the effect of HD-WLE on adenoma detection by including only randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

A literature search was performed for RCTs evaluating HD-WLE versus SDC in terms of adenoma, advanced adenoma, and serrated sessile adenoma detection rates as well as the mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy (MAC), the mean number of advanced adenomas per colonoscopy (MAAC), and the mean number of sessile serrated adenomas per colonoscopy (MSSAC). The effect size on study outcomes is presented as the risk ratio (RR; 95% confidence interval [CI]) or mean difference (MD; 95% CI). We assessed the strength of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Results

Six RCTs involving 4594 individuals (HD-WLE, 2323; SDC, 2271) were included. Clinical indications were screening (1 study), positive result for fecal occult blood test, personal/family history of colorectal cancer (1 study), and mixed indications (4 studies). Withdrawal time was similar between the 2 arms (MD, −0.06; 95% CI, −0.25 to 0.12; P = .50). The adenoma detection rate was significantly higher in the HD-WLE arm compared with the SDC arm (40% vs 35%; RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.05-1.22; P = .001; I2 = 0%; GRADE, low). This effect was consistent for advanced and sessile serrated adenoma detection rates (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.03-1.72; P = .03; I2 = 0%; GRADE, low; and RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.05-2.28; P = .03; I2 = 0%; GRADE, low, respectively). In contrast, the difference was not significant for MAC, MAAC, and MSSAC.

Conclusions

Meta-analyses of RCT data support the use of HD-WLE in clinical practice, although the additional benefit is limited.

Abbreviations

ADR
adenoma detection rate
CI
confidence interval
CRC
colorectal cancer
GRADE
Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation
HD-WLE
high-definition white-light endoscopy
MAAC
mean number of advanced adenomas per colonoscopy
MAC
mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy
MD
mean difference
MSSAC
mean number of sessile serrated adenomas per colonoscopy
NNT
number needed to treat
RCT
randomized controlled trial
RR
risk ratio
SDC
standard-definition colonoscopy
SSA/P
sessile serrated adenoma/polyp

Cited by (0)

DISCLOSURE: Dr Rex: Consultant for Olympus Corporation, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Aries Pharmaceutical, Braintree Laboratories, Lumendi, Ltd, Norgine, and Endokey; research support from, EndoAid, Olympus Corporation, Medivators, Erbe USA Inc; ownership of Satisfai Health; Dr Sharma: consultant for Olympus; grant support from Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Erbe, Medtronics, and US endoscopy. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships.

Drs Tziatzios and Gkolfakis contributed equally to this article.

View Abstract