ReviewThe hardening hypothesis: Is the ability to quit decreasing due to increasing nicotine dependence? A review and commentary
Introduction
Tobacco control has decreased the prevalence of smoking in the U.S.; however, this success has varied across populations (U.S. Dept Health and Human Services, 1989). For example, current smokers are more likely to have less education and income than prior smokers (MMWR, 2009). One hypothesis to explain such changes is that tobacco control has prompted the “easy-to-quit” smokers to quit and, thus, remaining smokers are those more resistant to stopping smoking. In 2003, two reviews of this “hardening” hypothesis concluded that (a) logically, one would expect hardening to occur; but (b) there is little empirical evidence of hardening (National Cancer Institute, 2003, Warner and Burns, 2003).
The purpose of the current article is to update these reviews. Because studies sometimes confuse measures of hardening with measures of the causes of hardening, and sometimes fail to distinguish quit attempts from successful abstinence after a quit attempt, the current article first presents a conceptualization of smoking cessation to facilitate discussion of hardening. Next, because definitions of hardening have become so idiosyncratic that they are substantially interfering with understanding the concept (Costa et al., 2010), the article suggests one definition (i.e., decreased ability to stop due to increased nicotine dependence) that is likely to be important to examine. Then, because the last review on hardening was 8 years ago, the paper presents more recent empirical tests of hardening. Finally, the paper suggests methodological assets to include in future studies.
Section snippets
A conceptualization of smoking cessation relevant to hardening
A change in smoking prevalence among adults can occur by a change in (a) the number of young smokers who become adult smokers, (b) the number of smokers who die, (c) the number of quit attempts, and (d) the ability to remain abstinent after a given quit attempt. Prior studies of hardening have focused on one or both of the latter two. In these studies, a quit attempt is typically defined as an attempt to stop smoking in the last year and often requires ≥24 h of abstinence (Hughes and Callas, 2010
Definitions of hardening
Hardening has been defined in many different ways (Costa et al., 2010, Hughes and Brandon, 2003). Some focus on the outcome; i.e., decreased quit attempts, decreased ability to abstain, or successful cessation. Others focus on possible causes; i.e., increased nicotine dependence, low motivation, low socioeconomic status and psychiatric co-morbidity. And others require both changes in outcomes and causes. This is problematic for several reasons. First, when definitions include several constructs
Populations in which hardening might be occurring
Hardening has often been thought of as a concept that should apply to the entire population of smokers; however, the concept has also been examined within subsets of smokers. The most commonly investigated subset has been treatment seekers. This distinction is important, because it is feasible that hardening could be occurring among treatment seekers but not in the population-at-large.
There are several other subgroups in which hardening might be occurring. One way to identify such subgroups is
Search for new studies
To locate possible new data on changes in the ability to remain abstinent over time due to nicotine dependence in July, 2010, the author searched PubMed, PsychInfo, Cochrane Library, clinicaltrials.gov, CRISP, CDC Tobacco Information and Prevention Database, and EMBASE for articles whose title, abstract or keyword included “hard* AND (smok* OR tobacco OR cigar* OR nicotin*).” The author's own files were searched. Any leads found in the reference lists of the articles obtained were pursued.
Results covered in prior two reviews
The prior two reviews (Warner and Burns, 2003, National Cancer Institute, 2003) cited two population-based surveys that examined the ability to remain abstinent. The U.S. Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS) (i.e., data from the U.S. census) provided a description of the proportion of smokers who were able to remain abstinent for 3+ months among smokers who tried to quit one or more times in the last year (National Cancer Institute, 2003, Warner and Burns, 2003).
Search for studies
To locate studies focusing on dependence, the author noted those articles in the above searches that had the terms “dependen*”’ and “addict*” in the abstract. Among the 87 articles, 22 seemed appropriate but only 5 were included.
Changes in nicotine dependence in population-based samples
Few surveys in the search used formal measures of nicotine dependence such as the Fagerstom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) or the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) (Piper et al., 2006). The most common proxy measure for dependence was cigs/day. In the prior
Overview
This paper suggests studies on hardening should (a) distinguish between whether hardening influences quit attempts or ability to remain abstinent, (b) distinguish between measures of hardening per se (e.g., ability to remain abstinent) vs. measures of presumed causes of hardening (e.g., dependence), (c) examine the ability to remain abstinent due to dependence, and (d) examine hardening in both treatment seekers and the general population of smokers. The review of existing data concludes
Role of funding source
The writing of this review was funded by Senior Scientist Award DA-00490 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The sponsor had no role in the writing of this report or the decision to submit the report.
Conflict of interest
Dr. Hughes is currently employed by The University of Vermont and Fletcher Allen Health Care. Since 1/1/2008, he has received research grants from the National Institute on Health and Pfizer; the later develops and sells smoking cessation medications. During this time, he has accepted honoraria or consulting fees from several non-profit and for-profit organizations and companies that develop, sell or promote smoking cessation products or services or educate/advocate about smoking cessation:
Acknowledgements
The author thanks David Burns and Kenneth Warner for comments on an early draft of this paper.
References (55)
- et al.
Deviance proneness” and adolescent smoking 1980 versus 2001: Has there been a “hardening” of adolescent smoking?
J. Appl. Dev. Psychol.
(2007) - et al.
Testing the Cigarette Dependence Scale in 4 samples of daily smokers: Psychiatric clinics, smoking cessation clinics, a smoking cessation website and in the general population
Addict. Behav.
(2009) - et al.
Tobacco addiction
Lancet
(2008) - et al.
Development of a screening questionnaire for tobacco/nicotine dependence according to ICD-10 DSM-III-R, and DSM-IV
Addict. Behav.
(1999) - et al.
Validity and reliability of Kano Test for Social Nicotine Dependence
Ann. Epidemiol.
(2009) - et al.
Use of smoking-cessation treatments in the United States
Am. J. Prev. Med.
(2008) Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis
J. Clin. Epidemiol.
(1995)- et al.
The California Tobacco Control Program's effect on adult smokers: (2) daily cigarette consumption levels
Tob. Control
(2007) - Bogdanovica, I., Godfrey, F., McNeill, A., Britton, J. Smoking prevalence in the European Union: a comparison of...
- et al.
Nicotine dependence in the United States: prevalence, trends and smoking persistence
Arch. Gen. Psychiatry
(2001)
State Medicaid coverage for tobacco-dependence treatments – United States, 2006
MMWR
Population health and the hardcore smoker: Geoffrey Rose revisited
J. Public Health Policy
The future of tobacco use and smoking research
Hardcore definitions and their application to a population-based sample of smokers
Nic. Tob. Res.
The impact of pharmaceutical company funding on results of randomized trials of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis
Addiction
A comparison of the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence and smoking prevalence across countries
Addiction
Nicotine dependence versus smoking prevalence: comparisons among countries and categories of smokers
Tob. Control
Measuring smoking cessation: problems with recall in the 1990 California Tobacco Survey
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
Changes in cigarette use and nicotine dependence in the United States: evidence from the 2001–2002 wave of the National Epidemiologic Survey of Alcoholism and Related Conditions
Am. J. Public Health
A multidimensional model for characterizing tobacco dependence
Nicotine Tob. Res.
A softer view of hardening
Nicotine Tob. Res.
Shape of the relapse curve and long-term abstinence among untreated smokers
Addiction
The future of smoking cessation therapy in the United States
Addiction
Distinguishing nicotine dependence from smoking: why it matters to tobacco control and psychiatry
Arch. Gen. Psychiatry
Cited by (106)
The prevalence, odds, predictors, and management of tobacco use disorder or nicotine dependence among people with severe mental illness: Systematic review and meta-analysis
2022, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsCigarette taxes, prices, and disparities in current smoking in the United States
2020, SSM - Population HealthCitation Excerpt :Moreover, smoking among youth, who have traditionally been the population most sensitive to tax and price increases (Chaloupka & Warner, 2000), is already at an all-time low (Johnston, O'Malley, Miech, Bachman, & Schulenberg, 2016). A greater share of today's smokers also may be more committed smokers or “hardened” (Hughes, 2011), who have lower ability or willingness to quit (Warner & Burns, 2003). For hardened smokers, cigarettes would become even less elastic goods, weakening the effectiveness of taxes.