Research
Obstetrics
Assessment of cesarean delivery availability in 26 low- and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional study

Presented in poster format at the First World Congress of Surgery, Obstetrics, Trauma, and Anesthesia, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, Oct. 16-17, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.022Get rights and content

Objective

We sought to assess the capacity to provide cesarean delivery (CD) in health facilities in low- and middle-income countries.

Study Design

We conducted secondary analysis of 719 health facilities, in 26 countries in Africa, the Pacific, Asia, and the Mediterranean, using facility-based cross-sectional data from the World Health Organization Situational Analysis Tool to Assess Emergency and Essential Surgical Care.

Results

A total of 531 (73.8%) facilities reported performing CD. In all, 126 (17.5%) facilities did not perform but referred CD; the most common reasons for doing so were lack of skills (53.2%) and nonfunctioning equipment (42.9%). All health facilities surveyed had at least 1 operating room. Of the facilities performing CD, 47.3% did not report the presence of any type of anesthesia provider and 17.9% did not report the presence of any type of obstetric/gynecological or surgical care provider. In facilities reporting a lack of functioning equipment, 26.4% had no access to an oxygen supply, 60.8% had no access to an anesthesia machine, and 65.9% had no access to a blood bank.

Conclusion

Provision of CD in facilities in low- and middle-income countries is hindered by a lack of an adequate anesthetic and surgical workforce and availability of oxygen, anesthesia, and blood banks.

Section snippets

WHO SAT to assess emergency and essential surgical care

The main outcome of this study was to determine the proportion of health facilities in LMICs performing CD. Secondary exposures of interest are reasons for referral of CD in those facilities that do not perform the procedure, availability of essential surgical elements in facilities performing and not performing CD, and availability of human personnel in facilities performing and not performing CD.

The standardized WHO SAT to assess emergency and essential surgical care, developed by the WHO

Results

A total of 18 countries were excluded from the aggregated data for providing information on <5 health facilities (Figure 1). Of the remaining 914 facilities, 195 did not have an operating room and were excluded from the study. Of these, 29 were district/rural/community hospitals, 9 were general hospitals, 126 were health centers, 14 were private/NGO/mission hospitals, 4 were provincial hospitals, and 13 did not provide a response for this data point. The 719 health facilities included in our

Comment

This study aimed to assess the surgical capacity of facilities providing CD in LMICs, and the reasons for referral in those facilities unable to provide CD. We found that 73.8% of facilities analyzed performed CD, with 17.5% not performing but referring the procedure. Lack of skills and nonfunctioning equipment were found to be major barriers to provision of CD. Even in facilities where CD was performed, our data demonstrate a lack of essential equipment and skilled anesthesia, obstetric, and

Acknowledgments

We are hugely grateful for the support of the health facility visit teams in the various countries included in this survey and in particular would like to thank Rev Dr Tomi Thomas (Catholic Health Association of India), Mr Bakary Jargo (WHO country office, The Gambia), Dr Ananda Gunasekera (Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka), Dr Håkon Angell Bolkan (CapaCare, Sierra Leone), Dr Tu Tran (University of California Haiti Initiative, Haiti), Dr Samuel Likasi (United Republic of Tanzania), Dr Opar Toliva

References (34)

  • A.P. Betran et al.

    Rates of cesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates

    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol

    (2007)
  • J.P. Souza et al.

    Cesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health

    BMC Med

    (2010)
  • World Health Organization. Maternal health around the world. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO...
  • World Health Organization. Essential elements of obstetric care at first referral level. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO;...
  • R. Laxminarayan et al.

    Intervention of cost-effectiveness: overview of main messages

  • D.A. Spiegel et al.

    World Health Organization Global Initiative for Emergency and Essential Surgical Care: 2011 and beyond

    World J Surg

    (2013)
  • A.L. Kushner et al.

    Addressing the millennium development goals from a surgical perspective essential surgery and anesthesia in 8 low- and middle-income countries

    Arch Surg

    (2010)
  • Cited by (41)

    • Obstetric anaesthesia over the next 10 years: Africa and Middle East

      2023, International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
    • Cesarean delivery in low- and middle-income countries: A review of quality of care metrics and targets for improvement

      2021, Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several reports indicate that CD rates have risen sharply with little to no accompanying increase in the number of theatres or equipment within facilities to provide CD, indicating overburdening of likely outdated facilities [67]. In another report from 26 LMICs, common reasons cited as barriers to performing CD were inconsistent access to functioning equipment, oxygen supply, anesthesia supplies, and blood banks [68]. In 2015, the Lancet Commission for Global Surgery identified ten areas of improvement needed for the performance of safe surgical and anesthesia care: (1–3) an adequately trained workforce (surgeon, anesthetist, nursing); (4–5) infrastructure, equipment, supplies, and drugs needed along with a supply chain that allows consistent availability; (6) decontamination and sterilization capacity; (7) safe and affordable blood supply; (8) 24 h surgical coverage; (9) quality improvement processes including audit of peri-operative outcomes; and (10) risk assessment and planning for procedures [69].

    • Maternal and neonatal outcomes after caesarean delivery in the African Surgical Outcomes Study: a 7-day prospective observational cohort study

      2019, The Lancet Global Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      Based on the small number of risk factors to be entered into the models, we made an a-priori decision to assess risk factors based on clinical plausibility and our understanding of their potential association with maternal or neonatal mortality. For the maternal mortality models the preoperative risk factors included were pre-eclampsia or eclampsia,17 major bleeding risk,8 any chronic medical condition, and preoperative sepsis, and the perioperative complications included were severe infections,12,17 severe cardiac complications,7 severe obstetric haemorrhage,11 and anaesthesia complications (appendix p 23).9 For the neonatal mortality model, our a-priori decision was to include three neonatal risk factors based on the American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on neonatal encephalopathy,18 two Apgar scores (<7 at 1 min, and <5 at 5 min), and the need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

    • Surgical and trauma care in low- and middle-income countries: a review of capacity assessments

      2017, Journal of Surgical Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Tools to evaluate both surgical and trauma care capacity were included in this review because of the extensive overlap in the care for the injured. Publications were excluded if they were retrospective analyses, lacked a well-described tool or methodology, or described a needs assessment or assessment focused outside of surgical or trauma care.19,27,59,60,73-101 A forward search was then conducted, and publications citing one of the papers identified in the initial selection process were collected.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors report no conflict of interest.

    Cite this article as: Ologunde R, Vogel JP, Cherian MN, et al. Assessment of cesarean delivery availability in 26 low- and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211:504.e1-12.

    View full text