CommentAn international registry of systematic-review protocols
References (12)
- et al.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
PLoS Med
(2009) - et al.
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration
PLoS Med
(2009) - et al.
Registering systematic reviews
CMAJ
(2009) - et al.
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews
PLoS Med
(2007) Many reviews are systematic but some are more transparent and completely reported than others
PLoS Med
(2007)- et al.
Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: comparing what was done to what was planned
JAMA
(2002)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (338)
Effectiveness of training actions aimed at improving critical thinking in the face of disinformation: A systematic review protocol
2024, Thinking Skills and CreativitySerum zonulin level as a novel approach in diagnosis and follow-up of patients with celiac disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis
2024, Nutrition Clinique et MetabolismePrevalence and risk factors for persistent symptoms after COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2024, Clinical Microbiology and InfectionAuthor instructions in biomedical journals infrequently address systematic review reporting and methodology: a cross-sectional study
2024, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyExposure to metal mixtures and adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes: A systematic review
2024, Science of the Total EnvironmentEvaluation of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction
2023, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.