CommentSystematic reviews: when is an update an update?
References (10)
Less than half of the Cochrane Reviews are current. Proceedings of the 11th Cochrane Coloquium: evidence, health care, and culture, Oct 26–31, 2003; Barcelona, Spain
Cochrane Methodol Register
(2005)- et al.
Better information for better health care: the Evidence-based Practice Center Program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Ann Intern Med
(2005) - et al.
Preparing and updating systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health care
Milbank Q
(1993) - et al.
Reporting, updating, and correcting systematic reviews of the effects of health care
BMJ
(1994)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (91)
Most systematic reviews that used the term “update” in title/abstract were not an updated version
2023, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyCitation Excerpt :The same challenges were brought up 10 years later in 2016 by Garner et al. [2], who defined an update as a new edition of a published SR with changes such as new data, methods, or analyses. The definition of Garner et al. [2] is thus different from the definition of Moher and Tsertsvadze, which requires new evidence that has not been included in the previously completed review [3]. The current version (version 6.3 from 2022) of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [5] cites the definition of Garner et al. [2] and highlights that introduction of new methods can change both results and the estimates of certainty in a review.
Acting in the face of evidentiary ambiguity, bias, and absence arising from systematic reviews in applied environmental science
2021, Science of the Total EnvironmentDefining rapid reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews
2021, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyThe quality of evidence for medical interventions does not improve or worsen: a metaepidemiological study of Cochrane reviews
2020, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyLiving network meta-analysis was feasible when considering the pace of evidence generation
2019, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.