References
Boruch, R., Petrosino, A. & Chalmers, I. (1999). The Campbell collaboration: A proposal for systematic, multi-national, and continuous reviews of evidence. Background paper for the meeting at University College-London, School of Public Policy, July.
Boruch, R., Snyder, B. & DeMoya, D. (2000). The importance of randomized field trials. Crime and Delinquency 46, 156–180.
Chalmers, I. & Altman, D. (1995). Systematic reviews. London: British Medicial Journal Press.
Cullen, F. & Gendreau, P. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In J. Horney (Ed.), Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system: Criminal justice 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Davies, P. (1999). What Is evidence-based education? British Journal of Educational Studies 47, 108–121.
Davies, H. T. O., Sandra, N. & Smith, P. (2000). What works: Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. London: Policy Press.
Egger, M. & Smith, G. D. (1998). Bias in location and selection of studies. British Medical Journal 316, 61–66.
Farrington, D. P. & Petrosino, A. (2000). Systematic reviews of criminological interventions: The Campbell Collaboration Crime & Justice Group. International Annals of Criminology 38(1/2), 49–66.
Farrington, D. & A. Petrosino. (2001). The Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 58, 35–49.
Farrington, D., Welsh, B. (2005). Randomized experiments in criminology: What have we learned in the last two decades? Journal of Experimental Criminology 1(1), 9–38.
Feder, L., Jolin, A. & Feyerherm, W. (2000). Lessons from two randomized experiments in criminal justice settings. Crime and Delinquency 46(3), 380–400.
Flay & Best. (1982). Overcoming design problems in evaluating health behavior programs. Evaluation and the Health Professions 5(1), 43–69.
Heckman, J. & Smith, J. A. (1995). Assessing the case for social experiments. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(2), 85–110.
Lum, C., Yang, S.-M. (2004). Why do evaluation researchers in crime and justice choose non-experimental methods? Journal of Experimental Criminology (forthcoming).
MacKenzie, D. (2000). Evidence-based corrections: Identifying what works. Crime and Delinquency 46, 457–471.
Millenson, M. L. (1997). Demanding medical excellence: Doctors and accountability in the information age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nutley, S. & Davies, H. T. O. (1999). The fall and rise of evidence in criminal justice. Public Money and Management 19, 47–54.
Petrosino, A., Boruch, R., Soydan, H., Duggan, L. & Sanchez-Meca, J. (2001). Meeting the challenges of evidence-based policy: The Campbell Collaboration. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 578, 14–34.
Petrosino, A., Boruch, R., Farrington, D., Sherman, L. & Weisburd, D. (2003). Towards evidence-based criminology and criminal justice: Systematic reviews and the Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group. The International Journal of Comparative Criminology 3(1), 18–41.
Shadish, W., Cook, T. & Campbell, D. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Sherman, L. (1998). Evidence-based policing. Ideas in american policing, July. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
Sherman, L., Farrington, D., Welsh, B. & MacKenzie, D. (Eds.). (2002). Evidence based crime prevention. New York: Routledge.
Visher, C. A. & Weisburd, D. (1998). Identifying what works: Recent trends in crime prevention. Crime, Law and Social Change 28, 223–242.
Weisburd, D. (2003). Ethical practice and evaluation of interventions in crime and justice. Evaluation Review 27, 336–354.
Weisburd, D., Lum, C. & Petrosino, A. (2001). Does research design affect study outcomes in criminal justice? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 578, 50–70.
Wilkinson, L. & Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist 54, 594–604.
Zuger, A. (1997). New Way of doctoring: By the book. New York Times, 16 December.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Editor’s introduction. J Exp Criminol 1, 1–8 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-005-0573-y
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-005-0573-y