Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Guidelines for conducting and reporting economic evaluation of fall prevention strategies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Falls in older people result in substantial health burden. Compelling evidence indicates that falls can be prevented. We developed comprehensive guidelines for economic evaluations of fall prevention interventions to facilitate publication of high-quality economic evaluations of the effective strategies and aid decision making.

Introduction

The importance of economics applied to falls and fall prevention in older people has largely been overlooked. The use of different methodologies to assess the costs and health benefits of the interventions and their comparators and the inconsistent reporting in the studies limits the usefulness of these economic evaluations for decision making. We developed guidelines to encourage and facilitate completion of high-quality economic evaluations of effective fall prevention strategies.

Methods

We used a generic checklist for economic evaluations as a platform to develop comprehensive guidelines for conducting and reporting economic evaluations of fall prevention strategies. We considered the many challenges involved, particularly in identifying, measuring, and valuing the relevant cost items.

Results

We recommend researchers include cost outcomes and report incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in terms of falls prevented and quality adjusted life years in all clinical trials of fall prevention interventions. Studies should include the following cost categories: (1) implementing the intervention, (2) delivering the comparator group intervention, (3) total health care costs, (4) costs of fall-related health care resource use, and (5) personal and informal carer opportunity costs.

Conclusions

This paper provides a timely benchmark to promote comparability and consistency for conducting and reporting economic evaluations of fall prevention strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Campbell AJ, Borrie MJ, Spears GF (1989) Risk factors for falls in a community-based prospective study of people 70 years and older. J Gerontol 44:M112–M117

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF (1988) Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med 319:1701–1707

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell AJ, Borrie MJ, Spears GF, Jackson SL, Brown JS, Fitzgerald JL (1990) Circumstances and consequences of falls experienced by a community population 70 years and over during a prospective study. Age Ageing 19:136–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Corso P, Finkelstein E, Miller T, Fiebelkorn I, Zaloshnja E (2006) Incidence and lifetime costs of injuries in the United States. Inj Prev 12:212–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong RY, Miller WC (2008) Adverse outcomes following hospitalization in acutely ill older patients. BMC Geriatr 8:10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Iglesias CP, Manca A, Torgerson DJ (2009) The health-related quality of life and cost implications of falls in elderly women. Osteoporos Int 20:869–878

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stel VS, Pluijm SM, Deeg DJ, Smit JH, Bouter LM, Lips P (2004) Functional limitations and poor physical performance as independent risk factors for self-reported fractures in older persons. Osteoporos Int 15:742–750

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Scuffham P, Chaplin S, Legood R (2003) Incidence and costs of unintentional falls in older people in the United Kingdom. J Epidemiol Community Health 57:740–744

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hornbrook MC, Stevens VJ, Wingfield DJ, Hollis JF, Greenlick MR, Ory MG (1994) Preventing falls among community-dwelling older persons: results from a randomized trial. Gerontologist 34:16–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gillespie LD, Robertson MC, Gillespie WJ, Lamb SE, Gates S, Cumming RG, Rowe BH (2009) Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Issue 2. Art. No.: CD007146.

  11. Davis JC, Robertson MC, Ashe MC, Liu-Ambrose T, Khan KM, Marra CA (2010) Does a home-based strength and balance programme in people aged ≥80 years provide the best value for money to prevent falls? A systematic review of economic evaluations of falls prevention interventions. Br J Sports Med 44:80–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Davis JC, Marra CA, Robertson MC, Khan KM, Najafzadeh M, Ashe MC, Liu-Ambrose T (2010) Economic evaluation of dose-response resistance training in older women: a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. Osteoporos Int. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1356-5

  13. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien B, Stoddart GL (2005) Methods for the economic evaluation for health care programmes, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beard J, Rowell D, Scott D, van Beurden E, Barnett L, Hughes K, Newman B (2006) Economic analysis of a community-based falls prevention program. Public Health 120:742–751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stevens JA, Corso PS, Finkelstein EA, Miller TR (2006) The costs of fatal and non-fatal falls among older adults. Inj Prev 12:290–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Seematter-Bagnoud L, Wietlisbach V, Yersin B, Bula CJ (2006) Healthcare utilization of elderly persons hospitalized after a noninjurious fall in a Swiss academic medical center. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:891–897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lamb SE, Jorstad-Stein EC, Hauer K, Becker C (2005) Development of a common outcome data set for fall injury prevention trials: the prevention of falls network Europe consensus. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:1618–1622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL (1993) Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 118:622–629

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR (1998) Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 2:1–74, i–iv

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Marra CA, Woolcott JC, Kopec JA, Shojania K, Offer R, Brazier JE, Esdaile JM, Anis AH (2005) A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Soc Sci Med 60:1571–1582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dolan P (1997) Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35:1095–1108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Torrance GW (1986) Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ 5:1–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Torrance GW (1987) Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life. J Chronic Dis Ther Res 40:593–603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M (2002) The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 21:271–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G (2003) The Health Utilities Index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW, Goldsmith CH, Zhu Z, DePauw S, Denton M, Boyle M (2002) Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 system. Med Care 40:113–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Harwood RH (2008) Economic evaluations of complex services for older people. Age Ageing 37:491–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bryan S, Hardyman W, Bentham P, Buckley A, Laight A (2005) Proxy completion of EQ-5D in patients with dementia. Qual Life Res 14:107–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sansoni J, Marosszeky N, Jeon Y-H, Chenoweth L, Hawthorne G, King M, Budge M, Zapart S, Sansoni E, Senior K, Kenny P, Low L (2007) Final report: dementia outcomes measurement suite project. Centre for Health Service Development, University of Wollongong, Wollongong

    Google Scholar 

  30. Coast J, Flynn TN, Natarajan L, Sproston K, Lewis J, Louviere JJ, Peters TJ (2008) Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Soc Sci Med 67:874–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Coast J, Peters TJ, Natarajan L, Sproston K, Flynn T (2008) An assessment of the construct validity of the descriptive system for the ICECAP capability measure for older people. Qual Life Res 17:967–976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Davis JC (2010) Health economic studies: a focus on health related quality of life, health resource utilization and falls prevention in vulnerable community dwelling seniors in medicine. University of British Columbia, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  33. Glick HA, Doshi JA, Sonnad SA, Polsky D (2007) Economic evaluation in clinical trials. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Oostenbrink JB, Al MJ (2005) The analysis of incomplete cost data due to dropout. Health Econ 14:763–776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Manca A, Palmer S (2005) Handling missing data in patient-level cost-effectiveness analysis alongside randomised clinical trials. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 4:65–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Briggs A, Clark T, Wolstenholme J, Clarke P (2003) Missing... presumed at random: cost-analysis of incomplete data. Health Econ 12:377–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gardiner JC, Sirbu CM, Rahbar MH (2004) Update on statistical power and sample size assessments for cost-effectiveness studies. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 4:89–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Briggs AH, Gray AM (1998) Power and sample size calculations for stochastic cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Decis Making 18:S81–S92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. O’Hagan A, Stevens JW (2002) Bayesian methods for design and analysis of cost-effectiveness trials in the evaluation of health care technologies. Stat Methods Med Res 11:469–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sonnenberg FA, Beck JR (1993) Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Making 13:322–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bryant T (2002) Role of knowledge in public health and health promotion policy change. Health Promot Int 17:89–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wiseman V, Mooney G (1998) Burden of illness estimates for priority setting: a debate revisited. Health Policy 43:243–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Mooney G, Irwig L, Leeder S (1997) Priority setting in health care: unburdening from the burden of disease. Aust N Z J Public Health 21:680–681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lamb SE, Hauer K, Becker C (2009) Manual for the fall prevention classification system. www.profane.eu.org/profane_documents/Falls_Taxonomy.pdf. Accessed Jan 2009

  45. Earnshaw J, Lewis G (2008) NICE guide to the methods of technology appraisal: pharmaceutical industry perspective. Pharmacoeconomics 26:725–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Jennifer C. Davis is funded by the Canadian Institute for Health Research Postdoctoral fellowship, Vancouver Coastal Health and the Brain Research Centre through Dr. Teresa Liu-Ambrose. Prof. Scuffham is the recipient of a National Health and Medical Research Council Career Development Award (#401742).

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. C. Davis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, J.C., Robertson, M.C., Comans, T. et al. Guidelines for conducting and reporting economic evaluation of fall prevention strategies. Osteoporos Int 22, 2449–2459 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1482-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1482-0

Keywords

Navigation