Summary of studies included in sensitivity analysis
Number of comparisons | Number of similar results | Number better in RCT | Number worse in RCT | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Selection bias: | ||||
Low risk | 6 | 6 | — | — |
No imbalance | 22 | 19 | 1 | 2 |
Adjusted results | 12 | 7 | 4 | 2 |
Partially controlled | 18 | 15 | 2 | 1 |
Poorly controlled | 33 | 30 | 3 | — |
Detection bias: | ||||
Low risk* | 78 | 66 | 8 | 3 |
Partially met, similarly measured | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
High risk | 8 | 8 | — | — |
Exclusion bias: | ||||
No losses to follow up | 38 | 32 | 4 | 2 |
1 person to 20% lost to follow up | 33 | 30 | 2 | 1 |
> 20% loss to follow up | 11 | 10 | — | 1 |
Unclear | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 |
Reasons for non-participation: | ||||
Refused | 27 | 18 | 7 | 2 |
Refused because of preference | 23 | 20 | 1 | 2 |
RCT versus preference trial | 16 | 15 | — | 1 |
Not invited | 8 | 8 | — | — |
Treated by non-participating clinicians | 1 | 1 | — | — |
Different skills required for treatment: | ||||
Surgery and procedures | 28 | 25 | 1 | 2 |
Drug treatment | 22 | 17 | 4 | 1 |
Radiology | 14 | 12 | 1 | 1 |
Usual care | 9 | 8 | 1 | — |
Counselling and education | 8 | 8 | — | — |
Watchful waiting | 7 | 6 | — | 1 |
Different clinical area: | ||||
Oncology | 28 | 23 | 3 | 2 |
Obstetrics and gynaecology | 14 | 12 | 2 | 1 |
Cardiology | 13 | 10 | 2 | 1 |
Other internal medicine | 11 | 9 | 2 | — |
Psychology and drug misuse | 9 | 9 | — | — |
Paediatrics | 8 | 7 | — | 1 |
Respiration | 2 | 2 | — | — |
RCT=randomised controlled trial.
↵* Outcomes were measured in same way.