Intended for healthcare professionals

Meacock et al peer review comments

These documents are the peer review history to go with a research paper by Meacock et al's which was rejected by The BMJ. For further information, please see this blog by The BMJ's research editors, where they explain why the paper was rejected.

Review: H Yasunaga

Review: N Freemantle

Review: R Martin

All notes - First appraisal

Appeal letter

Decision letter

Review: C Isles

Decision letter 2

This week's poll