Research
Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study
BMJ 2014; 349 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4145 (Published 01 July 2014) Cite this as: BMJ 2014;349:g4145Data supplement
Web Extra
Extra material supplied by the author
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Data Supplement - Supplementary information
Related articles
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 24 March 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c869
- Research Published: 24 March 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c723
- Research Published: 22 November 2011; BMJ 343 doi:10.1136/bmj.d6783
- Research Published: 15 March 2012; BMJ 344 doi:10.1136/bmj.e1553
- PAPERS Published: 02 March 2004; BMJ doi:10.1136/bmj.38023.700775.AE
- Paper Published: 18 March 2004; BMJ 328 doi:10.1136/bmj.38023.700775.AE
- Editorial Published: 03 September 2014; BMJ 349 doi:10.1136/bmj.g5394
See more
- Constitutional symptoms in a young personBMJ December 07, 2016, 355 i5781; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5781
- The BMJ Christmas appeal 2016-7: Orbis, the sight saversBMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6425; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6425
- EU to launch new antimicrobial resistance action planBMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i6328; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6328
- A typical sign on a plain knee radiographBMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i6021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6021
- An older man with thoracic back painBMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i5786; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5786
Cited by...
- Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials
- Barriers to reporting guideline adherence in point-of-care ultrasound research: a cross-sectional survey of authors and journal editors
- Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation
- Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting
- Effect of an editorial intervention to improve the completeness of reporting of randomised trials: a randomised controlled trial
- A systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting
- Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research
- Professional medical writing support and the quality, ethics and timeliness of clinical trial reporting: a systematic review
- Sackler Colloquium on Improving the Reproducibility of Scientific Research: Enhancing primary reports of randomized controlled trials: Three most common challenges and suggested solutions
- Sackler Colloquium on Improving the Reproducibility of Scientific Research: Issues with data and analyses: Errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions
- A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials
- Value and usability of unpublished data sources for systematic reviews and network meta-analyses
- Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a cross-sectional study
- Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort study
- Eighth international congress on peer review in biomedical publication
- Prepublication histories and open peer review at The BMJ