Integrating evidence based medicine into routine clinical practice: seven years' experience at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London
BMJ 2004; 329 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1020 (Published 28 October 2004) Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:1020Data supplement
[Posted as supplied by author] Notes for presenters at EBM meetings Evidence based medicine (EBM) has four steps:
- Formulation of a clear clinical question
- Searching the literature for relevant articles
- Evaluation (critical appraisal) of the evidence for its validity and usefulness
- Implementation of findings.
The chair of the EBM session will have identified the question and done the literature search. Each participant contributes a critical appraisal of the paper(s) they have been allocated.
There is a large literature on critical appraisal. The key papers from the JAMA series “Users’ Guide to the Medical Literature” are in the EBM file in the library. Useful texts include:
- Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Tugwell P, Guyatt GH. Clinical Epidemiology: a basic science for clinical medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1991.
- Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper. BMJ Books, 2000.
- Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. Churchill Livingstone, 2000.
Useful headings for the critical appraisal of papers are:
Study design
- type of study (observational or interventional? what type?)
- population studied
- case definition
Intervention
- if an intervention study, what was the intervention?
Results (e.g. for intervention studies)
Patients
- if an intervention study, how were they allocated to the study groups?
- are all patients accounted for, and how complete is follow up?
- were patients and health workers blinded to the treatment allocation?
Results
- was a valid measure of effect used?
- how large and how precise was the treatment effect?
- was the analysis appropriate?
Strengths of the study
What does this study add?
Weaknesses of the study
What, if anything, was done badly?
Relevance to our patients
Can these results be applied to our patients?
Presentation
Please prepare overheads; at the end of the session, give them to the chair, along with the paper you appraised.
Related articles
- This Week In The BMJ Published: 28 October 2004; BMJ 329 doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7473.0-f
- Quality Improvement Report Published: 28 October 2004; BMJ 329 doi:10.1136/bmj.38257.549653.55
See more
- Bird flu: Person with rare strain in US sparks alarm about cow transmissionBMJ April 04, 2024, 385 q797; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q797
- Antibiotic costs rise 1100% as big pharma exits NigeriaBMJ March 01, 2024, 384 q328; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q328
- Measles: 500 cases are confirmed in England as clusters appear around the countryBMJ February 15, 2024, 384 q417; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q417
- Alaskapox: First human death from zoonotic virus is announcedBMJ February 15, 2024, 384 q415; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q415
- Diphtheria: WHO publishes first ever guidance following outbreaksBMJ February 14, 2024, 384 q407; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q407