Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users
to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response
is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual
response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the
browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published
online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed.
Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles.
The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being
wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our
attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not
including references and author details. We will no longer post responses
that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
I totally agree with David Hodgkinson - how often have there been missed diagnoses by junior doctors, GPs and dare I say it consultants? We all have error rates: some time ago I called on the Colleges to set acceptable error rates and was met with a wall of silence: BMJ 2019;365:l4233 doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4233 (Published 19 June 2019)
I remember similar arguments being made when nurse practitioners first came on the scene and now we can't fill all the available posts.
Our experience, in NHS Lothian ENT, of physician associates is positive, and they have helped train FY2s, Core Trainees and GPSTs - our juniors think of them as part of the department, not as competition. We do triage the patients they see without direct supervision, very carefully.
The sooner the GMC regulates them so that we can train them to prescribe (limited drugs in a similar way to nurse practitioners) the better.