Adapting to transparent medical records: international experience with “open notes”
BMJ 2022; 379 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-069861 (Published 21 November 2022) Cite this as: BMJ 2022;379:e069861All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Dear Editor
Yes, Lasting Power of Attorneys for Health and Welfare have the rightt accept thge LPA donees' records.
in relation to patient safety, and if you have the time, it may be worth you reviewing the ongoing discussions and negotiations between doctors, governments and patient access to records devotees with special reference to patient safety and to the WHO 2021 to 2030 Patient Safety Plan.
Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021-2030 (who.int)
The plan, which was ratified by the 74th WHA, supports patient access to their own records.
Although the British Medical Association cites patient safety as a reason for not letting patients see their records, it is known that 20 to 30 % of patients who see their records find errors or omissions - not a "safe" system, perhaps?
The reasons for patient access to records are diverse but the Institute of Medicine described a comprehensive set of procedural improvements for Care in their book "Crossing the Quality chasm" - below. The openness perhaps also reflects many of the attributes of compassion as described in the seven habits of effective people described by Steven Covey
Crossing the Quality Chasm - Building a Better Delivery System - NCBI Bookshelf (nih.gov)
"The report finds that the current system is unable to provide safe, high quality care in a consistent manner. It consists of 10 rules to redesign the health system and a series of recommendations, including the allocation of $1 billion by Congress to support reform efforts. Crossing the quality Chasm can be read or ordered on line at www.nap.edu."
"Although it was thought by some that this report would not catch as much attention as the first, it has created quite a splash in the media. Headlines such as "US Health Care System said lacking" and "IT must BE used to reform US Health System" can be found in both the trade and popular press."
"New rules to redesign and improve care
1. "Care based o1. "Care based on continuing healing relationships. Patients should receive care whenever they need it and in many forms, not just face-to-face visits. This rule implies that the health care system should be responsive at all times (24 hours a day, every day) and that access to care should be provided over the internet, by telephone, and by other means in addition to face-to-face visits.
2. Customisation based on patient needs and values. The system of care should be designed to meet the most common types of needs, but have the capability to respond to individual patient choices and preferences.
3. The patient as the source of control. Patients should be given the necessary information and the opportunity to exercise the degree of control they choose over the health care decisions that affect them. The health system should be able to accommodate differences in patient preferences and encourage shared decision-making.
4. Shared knowledge and the free flow of information. Patients should have unfettered access to their own medical information and to clinical knowledge. Clinicians and patients should communicate effectively and share information.
5. Evidence-based decision-making. Patients should receive care based on the best available scientific knowledge. Care should not vary illogically from clinician to clinician or from place to place.
6. Safety as a system property. Patients should be safe from injury caused by the care system. Reducing risk and ensuring safety require greater attention to systems that help prevent and mitigate errors.
7. The need for transparency. The health care system should make information available to patients and their families that allows them to make informed decisions when selecting a health plan, hospital, or clinical practice, or when choosing among alternative treatments. This should include information describing the system's performance on safety, evidence-based-practice, and patient satisfaction.
8. Anticipation of needs. The health system should anticipate patient needs, rather than simply responding to events.
9. Continuous decrease in waste. The health system should not waste resources or patient time.
10. Co-operation among clinicians. Clinicians and institutions should actively collaborate and communicate to ensure an appropriate exchange of information and co-ordination of care.
The openness perhaps also reflects many of the attributes of compassion as described for "healthy families" as described by the Timberlawn project, I think
Family measurement techniques: Beavers-timberlawn family evaluation scale: The American Journal of Family Therapy: Vol 14, No 3 (tandfonline.com)
Mentally Healthy families
1) Positive in their attitude to life and other people.
2) The ‘love’ of healthy families involves closeness and distance. They are capable of great intimacy and affection, but they also feel self-sufficient and confident and free.
3) They are very clearly in charge of the lives.
4) The members of the family are always consulted very fully.
5) They communicate well. They are straightforward – direct and open and honest with each other.
6) They are very realistic and practical.
7) They have a remarkable ability to cope with change.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Dear Editor
Dear Anthony L Freeman
I have found the Patients' Association to be an excellent resource. The Digital roll out is chaotic.
https://www.patients-association.org.uk/seeing-your-medical-records
Competing interests: No competing interests
Dear Editor
2 points:
How does this work for those without internet access or not computer literate?
If one has Power of Attorney for health and welfare over a disabled relative, does this give one right of access to that person's medical records?
Competing interests: No competing interests
Five questions about Open Notes
Dear Editor
Is the development of Open Notes changing the landscape of medical writing and reporting in the charts?
Are we not verging on reducing medical reports to politically correct neutral statements?
Does this not emasculate medical reporting by frightening doctors from writing personal opinion or their own personal impressions on patients from fear of being sued or complained about?
Should there not be the equivalent of legal privilege for writing medical notes akin to safe spaces on university campuses or even diplomatic immunity?
The risk benefit analysis of having Open Notes seems to be benefit to the patients because they have access to the notes, and restriction on doctors in documenting facts with no opinion or impression given.
Does this not dilute truth telling, precision of doctors' impressions and holistic care?
Competing interests: No competing interests