Research
Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review
BMJ 2021; 375 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2281 (Published 20 October 2021) Cite this as: BMJ 2021;375:n2281
Data supplement
Web extra
- Data Supplement - Supplementary file: search strategy; summary table with criteria to judge risk of bias; table S1 showing characteristics of included studies (n=152); and tables S2 and S3 showing signalling questions for diagnosis and prognosis model studies
Related articles
- Research Published: 07 April 2020; BMJ 369 doi:10.1136/bmj.m1328
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 29 June 2009; BMJ 338 doi:10.1136/bmj.b2393
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 23 February 2009; BMJ 338 doi:10.1136/bmj.b375
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 18 March 2020; BMJ 368 doi:10.1136/bmj.m441
- Research Published: 25 March 2020; BMJ 368 doi:10.1136/bmj.m689
- Research Published: 16 May 2016; BMJ 353 doi:10.1136/bmj.i2416
- Opinion Published: 16 April 2024; BMJ 385 doi:10.1136/bmj.q832
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 16 April 2024; BMJ 385 doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-078378
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 03 September 2024; BMJ 386 doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-078276
See more
- Introductory AddressProv Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 1-4; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.1
- Report of the Meeting of the Eastern Branch of the Provincial Association at Bury St. Edmond'sProv Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 10-13; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.10
- Mr. Warburton's Bill for the Regulation of the Medical ProfessionProv Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 13-15; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.13
- An Atlas of Plates, illustrative of the Principles and Practice of Obstetric Medicine and Surgery, with descriptive LetterpressProv Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 4; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.4
- A Practical Treatise on the Diseases peculiar to Women, illustrated by Cases, &cProv Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 4-5; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.4-a
Cited by...
- Developing clinical prediction models: a step-by-step guide
- TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods
- Development and validation of risk prediction tools for pressure injury occurrence: An umbrella review
- Making the black box more transparent: improving the reporting of artificial intelligence studies in healthcare
- What Complexity Science Predicts About the Potential of Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning to Improve Primary Care
- ADNEX risk prediction model for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of external validation studies
- Role of machine learning in the management of epilepsy: a systematic review protocol
- Performances of machine learning algorithms in discriminating sacroiliitis features on MRI: a systematic review
- Clinical performance of automated machine learning: a systematic review
- The ADNEX risk prediction model for ovarian cancer diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validation studies
- Narrative Review of Machine Learning in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases for Clinicians and Researchers: Biases, Goals, and Future Directions
- Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a systematic review