Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles.
What a pity that the politics and politicians preclude the honest debate demanded by Mr Stevens over 7 years ago. Since nobody other than the professions recognises rationing, it has to remain covert until things get much worse. Enoch Powell recognised this in his book Politics and Health which Richard Smith described as "The best book written abotu the politics of the NHS".
How much better to have a debate about the choices in methods of rationing, and how to achieve the best ethical outcomes. Even your author Kar declined to use the word, and has not responded to my reply 11th November. https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4315
Kar says that patients deserve honesty about the limits of the NHS.1 To quote Enoch Powell: “The worst kind of rationing is that which is unacknowledged; for it is the essence of a good rationing system to be intelligible and consciously accepted.”23
If we continue with the collusion of denial between politicians and media, and assuming that technology advances faster than (any) government can keep up with, we are heading for a two tier system once again, as before 19