Millions will face surgery delays unless anaesthetic workforce grows, college warns
BMJ 2020; 371 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4579 (Published 24 November 2020) Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m4579
All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Dear Editor,
We read the recent BMJ article titled “Millions will face surgery delays unless anaesthetic workforce grows, college warns” with great interest and echo the concerns of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. This problem is not however exclusive to anaesthesia and exists in many specialties, with the NHS experiencing a workforce crisis long before the COVID-19 pandemic. Consultant posts are unfilled across the United Kingdom yet specialty training remains a bottleneck in most training programmes due to the lack of ST1 and ST3 posts available. The current training crisis is likely to compound the problem, with many trainees requiring extensions to their specialty programs due to loss of training opportunities during the pandemic. A recent audit of surgical trainees in the United Kingdom found that training cases have reduced by over 50% during the COVID-19 pandemic. If training and career progression is not maintained then we are likely to see an increase in the number of clinicians leaving training programmes.
The pandemic has been a catalyst for rapid change and development in teaching methodology which must continue, to maintain a high standard of training throughout and beyond the pandemic. Many have adapted remarkably to the loss of face-to-face training opportunities, inspiring the creation of novel virtual learning resources. Recent innovations in medical education have often been driven by trainees resulting in the generation of innovative and imaginative learning resources, in a time where increased flexibility of training is required. The adaptation of postgraduate examinations has been more of a challenge for both trainees and training institutions but one that is necessary to enable continued career progression.
The provision of good quality training will require a conscious buy-in by all stakeholders and trainees must seek every opportunity for learning and make use of novel resources. Trainers must plan for the delivery of medical education despite the demands of the pandemic, and training institutions have a responsibility to assist both of these groups. After all, if we do not invest in training today, we will find ourselves in a worsening workforce crisis in the near future.
Additionally, rates of physician burnout increasing. It has therefore never been more important to support the wellbeing of doctors. Awareness of the impact of burnout on doctor and patient health has grown significantly but there are many barriers remaining which prevent physicians accessing support and advice services. Good resources are often poorly advertised to those who would benefit from their services, and so it is the responsibility of all to ensure that doctors are regularly signposted towards wellbeing initiatives and services.
We agree that increased specialty recruitment is vital if we are to meet growing clinical demands but we feel that maintaining the training and wellbeing of clinicians already in specialty programmes must be given equal consideration in order to maintain the existing workforce.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Re: Millions will face surgery delays unless anaesthetic workforce grows, college warns
Dear Editor,
We are writing in response to the article from the BMJ (published Nov 2020) titled “Millions will face surgery delays unless anaesthetic workforce grows, college warns.”
Unfortunately, this problem has been compounded by the pandemic with a bottleneck appearing at the level of ST3 anaesthetic recruitment across the UK. This is likely multifactorial; many people have had training or CCT dates delayed due to missed training opportunities, shielding or re-deployment to intensive care in the first wave. In addition, there are other factors adding to these delays, such as more trainees choosing to work less than full time as registrars (particularly at 80%). This has impacted on the number of vacant registrar posts available at each stage of recruitment. Competition is high, with an arms race between trainees seeking to improve their CVs and portfolios in a never-ending race to the top.
This has obviously led to a lot of stress and frustration amongst trainees. This has been exacerbated by aspects such as anxieties around the pandemic, trying to obtain the Primacy FRCA, (which has been cancelled and moved to a novel online exam format) and the ever-changing recruitment process. Furthermore, since this time last year, there have been three different systems of interviewing for ST3 with different hurdles and processes for each one.
There were around 500 applicants for 132 jobs starting in February 2021 and the Anaesthetic National Recruitment Office website released between 191 and 294 jobs for August 2021. As we are sure that you can see, this will do little to fill the 600+ vacant consultant (and 200+ SAS) posts mentioned in the article!
Yours Sincerely
Dr Victoria Turnock
Clinical Fellow in Regional Anaesthesia
Countess of Chester Hospital
Dr Amit Dawar
Consultant Anaesthetist
Countess of Chester Hospital
Competing interests: No competing interests