Covid-19: Denmark to kill 17 million minks over mutation that could undermine vaccine effortBMJ 2020; 371 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4338 (Published 09 November 2020) Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m4338
All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
As we are well aware, a number of domestic and wild animal species have been reported to be (more or less) susceptible, either naturally and/or experimentally, to SARS-CoV-2 infection, with additional work comparing the "homology degree" of the ACE-2 viral receptor among several terrestrial and aquatic mammal species having made available a remarkable set of interesting data about the "potential susceptibility level" of the aforementioned species to SARS-CoV-2.
In this respect, however, as I have also emphasized in an "e.Letter" published in Science (1), we should also pay attention, I believe, to the inter-species homology degree of "neuropilin-1", a recently identified "co-receptor" facilitating SARS-CoV-2 cell enry and infectivity (2).
To the best of my knowledge, when taking a look at all the species to which SARS-CoV-2 has been "successfully" transmitted, under both natural and experimental conditions, minks rank as the only animals which have (spontaneously) acquired the virus from humans (spillover) and which have (still naturally) "returned" it to man (spillback), thus far. Additionally, and even more important, a new SARS-CoV-2 variant, provisionally named "cluster 5" and different from the SARS-CoV-2 strains circulating across the human population, has been described in fur minks intensely reared in Denmark as well as in local mink farmers (with further variants, carrying up to 3 aminoacid substitutions and 1 aminoacid deletion within their "spike protein's subunit 1", having been also detected in mink farms from the Netherlands as well as from other European Countries).
These findings are of concern for a number of reasons, with special emphasis on the possibility that the new "cluster 5 variant" identified in minks (and passed by them to mink farmers, an absolutely unprecedented finding, thus far!) could be less "immunogenic" as compared to the SARS-CoV-2 strains commonly infecting, and circulating among, people, coupled with the additional possibility that the forthcoming anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines - which should start to become publicly available within the next few months, most hopefully (!) - could not confer an adequate level of immune protection against the aforementioned viral isolate detected in minks.
While much more, "ad hoc" and in-depth research is urgently needed in order to provide a set of solid data and reliable answers to the above issues, I still believe that, when trying to "see things" as if we were the virus - thereby following the outstanding "legacy" left to us by Theobald Smith with his memorable "quadrilater" - SARS-CoV-2 should not be so "interested", after all, in gaining (spontaneous) access into "new species", provided it has a pandemic potential of almost 8 billion people in front of itself! And, it is among our chief responsibilities to prevent this from happening (until when one or more safe and effective vaccines will be available for all, at least!) through our individual behaviours and "life styles" in correctly wearing face masks, in keeping "physical distance" (I definitely prefer to use the adjective "physical" rather than "social") from, and in non grouping with, others, as well as in frequently disinfecting and/or washing our hands.
1) Di Guardo G. (2020) - Virus-neuropilin-1 interaction and animal models of SARS-CoV-2 infection (e.Letter). Science (https://science.sciencemag.org/content/370/6518/856/tab-e-letters).
2) Cantuti-Castelvetri L., et al. (2020) - Neuropilin-1 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 cell entry and infectivity. Science 370:856-860.
Competing interests: No competing interests