Laparoscopic versus robot assisted repair of ventral hernia
BMJ 2020; 370 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2480 (Published 14 July 2020) Cite this as: BMJ 2020;370:m2480Linked Research
Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair
Linked Opinion
Are robotics the future of surgery?
- Kristian Kiim Jensen, senior registrar
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg University Hospital, 2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark
- mail{at}kristiankiim.dk
Since the introduction of robot assisted surgery, its costs and anticipated benefits compared with those for conventional surgery have been debated. For some procedures, particularly radical prostatectomy, randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews have shown better outcomes with robot assisted surgery.1 Ventral hernia repair is a common procedure that accounted for an estimated 348 000 operations costing $3.2bn (£2.59bn; €2.85bn) in the US in 2006 alone,2 but the only evidence so far has come from retrospective studies with a high risk of bias.13 Now a linked study by Olavarria and colleagues (doi:10.1136/bmj.m2457) reports a multicentre, blinded, randomised controlled trial conducted in Texas, US, comparing the …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.