Covid-19: Questions remain over UK government’s PPE guidanceBMJ 2020; 369 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1964 (Published 15 May 2020) Cite this as: BMJ 2020;369:m1964
Staff should not need to fight for adequate protection at work, but the legal challenge launched against NHS England’s guidance is surely born of desperation.1
Initially the management mantra was that there were adequate national supplies of personal protective equipment (PPE) but problems with local distribution.2 When this became untenable, staff were blamed for using up PPE inappropriately.3 The narrative then changed to: “We share your pain and have done our utmost, but the increased international demand for PPE has made it unobtainable.”4 Despite government promises to fix things, surveys by the Royal College of Physicians indicated a deteriorating situation prompting its president to remark: “Healthcare workers risking their lives couldn’t care less how many billion pieces of PPE have been ordered or supplied. If it isn’t there when they need it, they are in harm’s way.”5
The current guidance for PPE does need clarification. Was the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention right in saying that the FFP (filtering facepiece) mask should be default rather than the fluid resistant surgical mask?6 Is it OK to reuse equipment originally intended for single use?7 Why is generating an aerosol by doing something to make a patient cough regarded as high risk when a patient generating an aerosol by coughing is not? Is it right to state categorically that covid-19 is not airborne (in which case why worry about aerosols at all)?8 Risk from pandemics has been rated high in the UK for at least 15 years,9 most recently in the 2019 National Security Risk Assessment,10 yet recommendations to stockpile PPE were ignored.11
Competing interests: None declared.
Full response at: https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1665/rr-1.
This article is made freely available for use in accordance with BMJ's website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.https://bmj.com/coronavirus/usage