How do we make feedback meaningful?
BMJ 2020; 368 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m17 (Published 07 January 2020) Cite this as: BMJ 2020;368:m17- Kate Womersley, academic foundation year 2 doctor1,
- Katherine Ripullone, academic foundation year 2 doctor2
- 1Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, UK
- 2Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, UK
- v1kwomer{at}ed.ac.uk
As a junior doctor, there’s no escape from feedback.
Multiscore feedback at least once a year (twice in Scotland) from other doctors, nurses, ward staff, and medical students provides commentary on a junior’s competence, professional approach, and teamworking. One negative comment triggers a further round of feedback. Workplace based assessments to appraise clinical reasoning, practical skills, and patient interaction are signed off by senior clinicians. Educational supervisors then give feedback on this feedback, but only after trainees complete feedback about their own performance.
Juniors give even more feedback than they receive: for colleagues’ e-portfolios and appraisals, weekly teaching sessions, satisfaction ratings for conferences, the four monthly NHS training survey, and annual GMC survey. What might be constructive dialogue can stray into ransom. Receiving a continuing professional development certificate after an educational event is conditional on submitting feedback. The NHS’s untested …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.