Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles.
I think it's a interesting point (one that I missed myself when I was reading the judgement, since it's hidden in a paragraph with the views of 4 other professionals) that the palliative care consultant felt that the situation with Covid-19 meant that removing the feeding tube and providing good palliative care wouldn't be possible.
When making the decision to withdraw treatment over the coming weeks and months, it's something we're going to have to think about - are we in the position, and do we have the resources, to give this person a good and peaceful death once treatment is withdrawn? If not, should be withdrawing at that time? And how do we balance that with preventing meaningless suffering to the patient we are going to withdraw on, since that's the most likely reason we're actually withdrawing?
It looks like we're going to have a big balancing act on our hands, trying to do the best by our dying patients.