From conference centre to hospitalBMJ 2020; 368 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1298 (Published 31 March 2020) Cite this as: BMJ 2020;368:m1298
All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
NHS Nightingale UK and Javits Center USA – COVID 19 should serve as a lesson for permanent future pandemic healthcare centres
Too little too late are words being uttered by medical professionals in both the UK and US at the rising numbers of confirmed COVID-19 cases and fatalities. Healthcare architects and engineers certainly support these sentiments, given the frantic scramble for adaptive re-use of existing spaces to deliver care. Knowing weeks in advance of the global spread of this virus did little to spark momentum in both US and UK health systems to prepare early for what would lie ahead.
Now we face the consequences of timely infrastructure action. Delays in understanding how best to house patients and protect healthcare workers have prompted multi-faceted solutions for spaces and equipment to deliver effective care.
The rising numbers of confirmed cases have led to makeshift centres being erected at record speed. Centres that should have already existed.
Pandemics have long been known to be a concern for populations. The temporary centres we now visualize as salvage measures are being arranged at a time where many lives have already been lost. In an effort to support the pandemic response, architects and engineers are now working to consider build-outs of existing shell spaces, to repurpose existing buildings, to develop mobile modular critical care units that can be quickly deployed within existing arenas or installed in outdoor spaces, and to even use religious buildings to decant our hospitals to make room for infected patients.
We hope that when the next pandemic arises, example field hospitals such as the UK’s NHS Nightingale and New York City’s Javits Center have remained permanent features ready for action and not resurrected whilst we continue to observe the passing of the next pandemic sufferers. We certainly should not be waiting for the curve to spike to turn to makeshift hospitals to house our patients. Pandemic ready centres need to be considered essential for future generations.
Competing interests: No competing interests