Paracetamol for pain in adults
BMJ 2019; 367 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6693 (Published 31 December 2019) Cite this as: BMJ 2019;367:l6693All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Dear Editor,
Regarding use of paracetamol regularly for a longer duration for chronic pain, I note in Tips for Patients that “Your doctor may advise periodic blood tests to monitor liver function”. This is also mentioned in the main text “particularly for older people”.
I cannot see any evidence for suggesting this practice from the references given. It concerns me greatly that patients may have the impression that this is being stated by an authoritative source, when the basis is unclear or even absent.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Dear Editor
We're told we need to know "a trial of paracetamol is reasonable in patients with... migraine, headache..." yet in acute migraine "the evidence is of low quality and the effect size smaller than other commonly used analgesics for migraine" and in tension-type headache the NNT for pain free at 2 hours is 22 (95% CI 15-40).
This means that you have to treat tension type headache with paracetamol in about 22 people to obtain one good response.
Accordingly I suspect that I am not the only headache specialist who does not share the authors' assertion that paracetamol is a reasonable recommendation for migraine or headache, for which the natural history (1 in 3 pain free at 2 hours on placebo in acute migraine trials) is much better than the response to paracetamol.
Bottom line: if one has tension type headache, then you're about seven times as likely to recover at 2 hours by nature alone, compared with taking paracetamol.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Dear Editor,
An extensive overview review of 16 published systematic reviews and 4 meta-analyses on management of acute and chronic pain conditions concluded that ibuprofen was superior than paracetamol in producing adequate pain relief in more tested patients.
This overview questioned the practice of routinely using paracetamol as a first line analgesic because there is no good evidence for efficacy of paracetamol in many pain conditions.
Reference
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25530283
A recent Cochrane systematic review of 10 published randomized placebo-controlled trials demonstrated that even high dose paracetamol administration provided no clinically important improvements in pain and physical function for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis.
Reference
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013273/full
Competing interests: No competing interests
Sore throat forgotten: more evidence of the lack of data in primary care?
Dear Editor,
We read with great interest the review written by Saragiotto et al., « Paracetamol for pain in adults », focused on primary care.
We would like to thank the authors for their effort to try to summarize in a few pages the current scientific evidence about the efficacy and the security of this analgesic in primary care, even if the final result cannot claim to be exhaustive:
• Sore throat pain/upper respiratory tract infections should have been added to clinical contexts mentioned in this report: the analgesic efficacy of a single dose of oral paracetamol versus placebo has already been proven by a few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in this context [1].
• Results of Cochrane meta-analyses were highlighted by the authors (« Table 1 presents key findings from the Cochrane reviews of paracetamol for pain relief in these conditions »); but they also present results from two non-Cochrane meta-analyses (Hazlewood 2012 [2] and Garcia-Perdomo 2017 [3]) without any justification about this choice*.
• Data concerning acute renal colic pain are also reported, although these data are provided by only one study assessing the efficacy of paracetamol versus placebo, administered by intravenous route, in patients recruited from a hospital emergency department [4].
Furthermore, we think that distinction between acute pain conditions (such as headache) and chronic pain conditions (such as osteoarthritis) should have been pointed out because outcome criteria in RCTs differ in these two conditions:
• In acute pain, RCTs usually assess the efficacy of a single dose of paracetamol within hours after drug administration.
• In chronic pain, RCTs usually assess the efficacy of repeated doses on pain, which is at best rated daily (but often at several weeks apart), and/or on patient functions.
The questions « Will I be relieved within hours after drug intake ? » and « Will this drug relieve my pain in the coming weeks ? », «Will this drug help me move better/function better ? » are different questions which may have different responses, but not necessarily conflicting. To the best of our knowledge, there is no RCT on chronic pain and assessing a single dose of oral paracetamol versus placebo within hours after drug intake, to be able to answer to the patient from the case report.
Finally, this work is one more evidence of the few clinical contexts of primary care where the analgesic effect of paracetamol has been studied, whereas paracetamol is widely prescribed in primary care. Most of efficacy data concerning paracetamol versus placebo on acute pain come from postoperative pain trials, because these situations are well standardized and therefore more able to find a difference, even if it is small, between paracetamol and placebo [5]. But the mechanism of action of paracetamol is still incompletely known, and some data suggest that its action could depend on the inflammatory cellular context [6]. Applying the results obtained in a few clinical pain conditions -- in most cases postoperative pain conditions -- to all pain conditions we usually meet in primary care, cannot be taken for granted. At equal baseline intensity pain level, does an oral dose of paracetamol relieve, regardless of the disease causing pain, and does it always relieve with the same effect size (a little, a lot, or not at all)? This question of a potential interaction between the pharmacological effect of paracetamol and the clinical context is, to our knowledge, remains unanswered.
* Note to Editor : All bibliographic references from Table 1 have been mixed up.
(Thanks to Deep B. for his assistance for translation)
References
1. Gougain M, Moreau A, Boussageon R, Pickering G, Gueyffier F. Acute analgesic effect of paracetamol in primary care : incomplete evidence. Therapie 2017 ; 72(5) : 609-13
2. Hazlewood G, Van der Heijde DM, Bombardier C. Paracetamol for the management of pain in inflammatory arthritis: a systematic literature review. J Rheumatol Suppl 2012;90:11-6. 10.3899/jrheum.120336 22942323
3. García-Perdomo HA, Echeverría-García F, López H, Fernández N, Manzano-Nunez R. Pharmacologic interventions to treat renal colic pain in acute stone episodes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Urol 2017;27:654-65.
4. Bektas F, Eken C, Karadeniz O, Goksu E, Cubuk M, CeteY. Intravenous paracetamol or morphine for the treatment of renal colic: A randomized placebo-controlledtrial. Ann Emerg Med 2009 ; 54 : 568-74
5. Cooper SA, Desjardins PJ, Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Katz NP, Kehlet H, et al. Research design considerations for single-dose analgesic clinical trials in acute pain : IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2016 ; 157(2) : 288-301
6. Graham GG, Davies MJ, Day RO, Mohamudally A, Scott KF. The modern pharmacology of paracetamol : therapeutic actions, mechanism of action, metabolism, toxicity and recent pharmacological findings. Inflammopharmacology 2013 ; 21(3) :201-32
Competing interests: No competing interests