Sexual violence against women: a multidisciplinary integrated care model
BMJ 2019; 367 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6616 (Published 27 November 2019) Cite this as: BMJ 2019;367:l6616- Giussy Barbara, obstetrician and gynaecologist1,
- Federica Facchin, assistant professor2,
- Paolo Vercellini, professor and director3,
- Cristina Cattaneo, professor of forensic medicine4,
- Alessandra Kustermann, director of obstetrics and gynaecology and head1
- 1Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico and SVSeD (Service for Sexual and Domestic Violence), via della Commenda 12, Milan, Italy
- 2Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo Gemelli 1, Milan, Italy
- 3Gynaecological Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, via della Commenda 12, Milan, Italy
- 4Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health and SVSeD (Service for Sexual and Domestic Violence), University of Milan, via Mangiagalli 37, Milan, Italy
- giussy.barbara{at}gmail.com
Ades and colleagues say that women who have experienced sexual violence require multidisciplinary, trauma informed care tackling their medical and psychological needs, either short or long term.1 Our sexual and domestic violence service, founded in 1996, adopts an integrated multidisciplinary approach, with a team composed of gynaecologists, psychologists, social workers, forensic practitioners, sexologists, lawyers, and paediatricians when needed.2
Meticulous examination, interpretation, and documentation of genital and extragenital lesions, and correct evidence collection—such as DNA swabs, sperm slides, and blood and urine samples to test for drug facilitated rape—are also fundamental, as they might affect legal proceedings. These practices require high levels of specialisation, as well as effective collaboration between all the professionals involved.
Physical examination and evidence collection should be conducted in full respect of women’s dignity, which is an important component of their perception of justice.3 A lack of sensitivity during these procedures might intensify psychological trauma by re-exposing women to objectification, in the sense of feeling treated like a body of evidence rather than a person of worth.
Based on our experience, collecting data for the judicial system is as important as clinical assistance; we have found that appropriate and professional management of forensic evidence and, at times, even condemnation of the perpetrator, can significantly improve women’s psychological outcomes and quality of life.
Securing justice for women who have experienced sexual violence is a complex process that should not be exclusively aimed at convicting the perpetrators. Providing patient centred care, characterised by sensitivity, empathy, and attention, is a fundamental component of restoring justice.
Footnotes
Competing interests: None declared.
Full response at: https://www.bmj.com/content/367/bmj.l5825/rr.
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.