US rule would strip science from environmental policies and increase premature deaths, warn scientists
BMJ 2019; 367 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6544 (Published 15 November 2019) Cite this as: BMJ 2019;367:l6544- Owen Dyer
- Montreal, Canada
Decades of landmark public health studies on matters such as air pollution and water quality could be eliminated from consideration in future decision from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), health experts have warned.
Scientists told the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology that the Trump administration is demanding access to the underlying data behind health studies used in decision making, including confidential patient information. They appeared before a Congressional hearing on a rule change—which has been billed as a means of improving transparency—proposed by the Trump appointed EPA administrator, Andrew Wheeler.
Since allowing access to such data would breach confidentiality agreements between researchers and study participants, many studies would be excluded from consideration when drawing up new rules on problems like lead contamination or vehicle emissions, said the scientists. Included among these would be many landmark studies underpinning knowledge of the harms these pollutants …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.