Letters
Evidence base of guidelines
Guidelines are not perfect but provide safeguards for both patients and physicians
BMJ 2019; 366 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5052 (Published 12 August 2019) Cite this as: BMJ 2019;366:l5052
- Peter A Andrews, consultant nephrologist
- South West Thames Renal and Transplantation Unit, St Helier Hospital, Carshalton SM5 1AA, UK
- peter.andrews4{at}nhs.net
Elwenspoek and colleagues review the evidence base behind the current UK guidelines for monitoring diabetes and hypertension in primary care.1 They rightly conclude that most current guidelines are based on expert opinion and consensus rather than “hard” or published evidence.
The authors argue that unnecessary testing in primary care can lead to false positive and false negative results, increased workload, and higher …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.