Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users
to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response
is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual
response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the
browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published
online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed.
Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles.
The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being
wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our
attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not
including references and author details. We will no longer post responses
that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
It’s about time that the inquest process is adapted to societal change since suicide was decriminalised over half a century ago. Bereaved families should be put in the front & centre of the new policy. Timely processing of unexplained deaths is a key step in bringing some form of closure for the loved ones. Lowering the burden of proof may reduce the need for lengthy legal arguments, which in turn can result in speedy conclusion of the proceedings. If one inquests takes less time on average, there is a good chance that waiting times will be shortened, bringing a much needed system improvement.
We also need more help for the bereaved families in the form of a liaison service. Let’s not forget supporting the professionals involved in the care of people who end there lives. In a nutshell, a more humanistic & less legalistic approach to such human tragedies is a step in the right direction.