Intended for healthcare professionals

Practice Uncertainties

Are guidelines for monitoring chronic disease in primary care evidence based?

BMJ 2019; 365 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2319 (Published 13 June 2019) Cite this as: BMJ 2019;365:l2319

Cited by...

'Diagnostic downshift: clinical and system consequences of extrapolating secondary care testing tactics to primary care
- Abstract
- Fulltext
- PDF
Guidelines are not perfect but provide safeguards for both patients and physicians
- Abstract
- Fulltext
- PDF
Artificial intelligence could bring relevant guidelines into every consultation
- Abstract
- Fulltext
- PDF

See other articles in issue 8204

Article tools

PDF 2 responses

Respond to this article
Print
Alerts & updates
Article alerts
Please note: your email address is provided to the journal, which may use this information for marketing purposes.

Log in or register:

Username *

Password *

Register for alerts

If you have registered for alerts, you should use your registered email address as your username
Citation tools
Download this article to citation manager

Martha M C Elwenspoek research associate, Rita Patel senior research associate, Jessica C Watson GP, doctoral research fellow, Penny Whiting senior lecturer, programme director of MSc in epidemiology

Elwenspoek M M C, Patel R, Watson J C, Whiting P. Are guidelines for monitoring chronic disease in primary care evidence based? BMJ 2019; 365 :l2319 doi:10.1136/bmj.l2319

BibTeX (win & mac)Download

EndNote (tagged)Download

EndNote 8 (xml)Download

RefWorks Tagged (win & mac)Download

RIS (win only)Download

MedlarsDownload

Help

If you are unable to import citations, please contact technical support for your product directly (links go to external sites):

EndNote

ProCite

Reference Manager

RefWorks

Zotero
Request permissions

Topics

Uncertainties page