De-diagnosing disease
BMJ 2019; 365 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2044 (Published 09 May 2019) Cite this as: BMJ 2019;365:l2044- Martin Marshall, professor of healthcare improvement, vice chair, GP123
- 1University College London, UK
- 2Royal College of General Practitioners
- 3East London, UK
- Follow Martin on Twitter @MarshallProf
I tried to placate an angry man in my clinic the other day but I wasn’t very successful. The problem wasn’t that he had to wait two weeks to get an appointment, it was more profound.
“All I want to know,” said Mr Brown, “is do I or don’t I have a disease?”
A recent blood test suggested a diagnosis of pre-diabetes. Our practice systems had swung into action and Mr Brown was trying to deal with the emotional and practical consequences. My explanation that he didn’t have a disease as such, more that he was at risk of developing one, a kind of “pre-disease,” didn’t seem to help.
Making, or excluding, disease diagnoses is what GPs are trained to do. The underpinning methodology is straightforward, in principle at least; panels of experts develop guidelines which describe diagnostic criteria, based on the best …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.