Intended for healthcare professionals

Views And Reviews

De-diagnosing disease

BMJ 2019; 365 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2044 (Published 09 May 2019) Cite this as: BMJ 2019;365:l2044
  1. Martin Marshall, professor of healthcare improvement, vice chair, GP123
  1. 1University College London, UK
  2. 2Royal College of General Practitioners
  3. 3East London, UK
  1. Follow Martin on Twitter @MarshallProf

New diagnostic labels should be more cautiously applied and established diagnoses should be regularly reviewed

I tried to placate an angry man in my clinic the other day but I wasn’t very successful. The problem wasn’t that he had to wait two weeks to get an appointment, it was more profound.

“All I want to know,” said Mr Brown, “is do I or don’t I have a disease?”

A recent blood test suggested a diagnosis of pre-diabetes. Our practice systems had swung into action and Mr Brown was trying to deal with the emotional and practical consequences. My explanation that he didn’t have a disease as such, more that he was at risk of developing one, a kind of “pre-disease,” didn’t seem to help.

Making, or excluding, disease diagnoses is what GPs are trained to do. The underpinning methodology is straightforward, in principle at least; panels of experts develop guidelines which describe diagnostic criteria, based on the best …

View Full Text

Log in

Log in through your institution

Subscribe

* For online subscription