Letters Tackling female genital mutilation in the UK Misleading use of FGM statistics compounds concerns about their reliability BMJ 2019; 364 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l927 (Published 05 March 2019) Cite this as: BMJ 2019;364:l927 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Editorial Tackling female genital mutilation in the UK Published: 07 January 2019; BMJ 364 doi:10.1136/bmj.l15 Analysis UK policy response to female genital mutilation needs urgent rethink Published: 23 November 2023; BMJ 383 doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-074751 See more Introductory Address Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 1-4; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.1 Report of the Meeting of the Eastern Branch of the Provincial Association at Bury St. Edmond's Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 10-13; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.10 Mr. Warburton's Bill for the Regulation of the Medical Profession Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 13-15; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.13 An Atlas of Plates, illustrative of the Principles and Practice of Obstetric Medicine and Surgery, with descriptive Letterpress Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 4; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.4 A Practical Treatise on the Diseases peculiar to Women, illustrated by Cases, &c Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 4-5; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.4-a Cited by... UK policy response to female genital mutilation needs urgent rethinkFulltext PDF Epidemiological surveillance study of female genital mutilation in the UKFulltext PDF Abstract
