Vertebral augmentation in osteoporosis: common procedures for spinal fractures show no benefit
BMJ 2019; 364 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l515 (Published 31 January 2019) Cite this as: BMJ 2019;364:l515- Owen Dyer
- Montreal
Two common surgical interventions for spinal fractures caused by osteoporosis are no more effective than placebo or sham surgery in bringing lasting relief from pain and disability, a taskforce of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research has concluded from a meta-analysis of existing studies.1
About 750 000 patients have such a fracture each year in the United States, and roughly a third of these experience acute pain and disability, although this often resolves after several months.
Over 30 000 patients a year are treated with “vertebral augmentation” therapies: mostly percutaneous vertebroplasty, where bone cement is injected into the vertebra; or kyphoplasty, where a balloon or bone tamp is introduced into …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £164 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£30 / $37 / €33 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.