Rapid responses are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on thebmj.com. Although a selection of rapid responses will be included online and in print as readers' letters, their first appearance online means that they are published articles. If you need the url (web address) of an individual response, perhaps for citation purposes, simply click on the response headline and copy the url from the browser window. Letters are indexed in PubMed.
I agree that technology is not the problem, it has much more to do with system change. Technology can be an enabler, but only in the service of the right goals, not for its own sake.
Some recent policy initiatives start from the technology such as video consultations, without considering the problem they might solve or whether the technology is appropriate.
As we offer video equally alongside messaging, telephone and face to face consulting options for both patients and clinicians, we are in a position to compare take up and video is surprisingly low.
What is urgently required is independent evaluation of "technologies" in the broadest sense of means of system operation, which may include digital, so that clinicians, commissioners and policy makers can make informed choices.
The problems to be solved are all too evident, in terms of patient waiting times, GP workload and shrinking workforce. There is no time to lose, and a four year academic publishing cycle is simply too slow. We need evaluation within months.
Chief Executive of GP Access Ltd which provides askmyGP, an online platform enabling communication and workflow between patients and GPs, including video and online consultations.