Rapid responses are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on thebmj.com. Although a selection of rapid responses will be included online and in print as readers' letters, their first appearance online means that they are published articles. If you need the url (web address) of an individual response, perhaps for citation purposes, simply click on the response headline and copy the url from the browser window. Letters are indexed in PubMed.
I agree with Stevens regarding the position that people wanting to use cannabis for their health now find themselves in, essentially forced to break the law as the new access to cannabis products process is overly cautious.
It is difficult to know if restricted access to cannabis products under this new policy is deliberate or accidental. Either way it has given false hope to many people who may well be in need of hope as well as medicine, that seems cruel.
Much of the reluctance by professional bodies and potential prescribers seems to be due to lack of education and training about the evidence in relation to cannabis and health. This is an issue which the British Medical Association should take the lead on and provide training and information to its members. They could use the guide on medicinal cannabis produced this year by the Australian Government (1). This guide would be of benefit to patients who, as Stevens points out, have a right to self-medicate.