Feature
Essay
Research waste is still a scandal—an essay by Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers
BMJ 2018; 363 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4645 (Published 12 November 2018) Cite this as: BMJ 2018;363:k4645Linked opinion
Is 85% of health research really “wasted”?
Linked opinion
Funders and regulators are more important than journals in fixing the waste in research
Related articles
- Editorial Published: 29 January 1994; BMJ 308 doi:10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283
- Editorial Published: 20 June 2017; BMJ 357 doi:10.1136/bmj.j2973
- Feature Published: 06 July 2015; BMJ 351 doi:10.1136/bmj.h3660
- Letter Published: 08 March 2019; BMJ 364 doi:10.1136/bmj.l700
- Letter Published: 08 March 2019; BMJ 364 doi:10.1136/bmj.l795
- Letter Published: 08 March 2019; BMJ 364 doi:10.1136/bmj.l802
- Letter Published: 08 March 2019; BMJ 364 doi:10.1136/bmj.l808
- Feature Published: 03 October 2019; BMJ 367 doi:10.1136/bmj.l5561
- Analysis Published: 16 October 2020; BMJ 371 doi:10.1136/bmj.m3869
- Analysis Published: 16 February 2021; BMJ 372 doi:10.1136/bmj.n178
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 30 March 2022; BMJ 376 doi:10.1136/bmj-2021-067476
See more
- Introductory AddressProv Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 1-4; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.1
- Report of the Meeting of the Eastern Branch of the Provincial Association at Bury St. Edmond'sProv Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 10-13; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.10
- Mr. Warburton's Bill for the Regulation of the Medical ProfessionProv Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 13-15; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.13
- An Atlas of Plates, illustrative of the Principles and Practice of Obstetric Medicine and Surgery, with descriptive LetterpressProv Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 4; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.4
- A Practical Treatise on the Diseases peculiar to Women, illustrated by Cases, &cProv Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 4-5; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.4-a
Cited by...
- Inclusion, characteristics and credibility of systematic reviews in doctoral theses: A cross-sectional study of all Medical Faculties in Sweden
- The use and application of Lean Management methods to research processes--a scoping review protocol
- A cross sectional survey of Australian and New Zealand specialist trainees research experiences and outputs
- Challenges and opportunities in coproduction: reflections on working with young people to develop an intervention to prevent violence in informal settlements in South Africa
- Research waste from poor reporting of core methods and results and redundancy in studies of reporting guideline adherence: a meta-research review
- Child and family-focused interventions for child maltreatment and domestic abuse: development of core outcome sets
- Potential adverse effects of an educational intervention: Development of a framework
- Designing an online intervention for adults with addictive eating: a qualitative integrated knowledge translation approach
- How to design high quality acupuncture trials--a consensus informed by evidence
- Effective engagement and involvement with community stakeholders in the co-production of global health research
- Methodological Rigor in COVID-19 Clinical Research - A Systematic Review and Case-Control Analysis
- Producing and using timely comparative evidence on drugs: lessons from clinical trials for covid-19
- Inadequate Reporting of Analytical Characteristics of Biomarkers Used in Clinical Research: A Threat to Interpretation and Replication of Study Findings
- Blockchains potential to improve clinical trials--an essay by Leeza Osipenko
- Research wastage: industry versus academic sponsorship
- Collaborative student research efforts provide a solution to research wastage
- Authors reply to Sharp and Curlewis, Ahmed and colleagues, and Sreeharan
- Research waste is still a scandal--especially in medical students