Health systems should be publicly funded and publicly provided
BMJ 2018; 362 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k3580 (Published 10 September 2018) Cite this as: BMJ 2018;362:k3580- Neena Modi, professor of neonatal medicine1,
- Jonathan Clarke, clinical research fellow2,
- Martin McKee, professor of European public health3
- 1Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster campus, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NG, UK
- 2Centre for Health Policy, Imperial College London, UK
- 3London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Correspondence to: N Modi n.modi@imperial.ac.uk
In a publicly funded health system such as the NHS, does it matter whether care is provided publicly or privately? Here we discuss evidence relevant to this question. Definitions of what we mean by “public” and “private” are found in box 1.
Definitions
Publicly funded—paid for out of the public purse
Publicly provided—delivered by a public sector workforce, in facilities that are managed and owned by public sector organisations
Privately funded—paid for directly through out-of-pocket payments, indirectly through insurance, or by charity
Privately provided—services that are managed and owned, or a workforce that is employed by, a for-profit organisation, not-for-profit social enterprise or charity; or a self employed workforce
Market mechanisms
At the heart of the question of who should provide health services is their commodification, through the application of market mechanisms, so that healthcare is regarded as a product to be bought and sold. Arguments about markets as a means of delivering healthcare were set out as long ago as 1963 by the Nobel laureate Kenneth Arrow.1 In his landmark paper Arrow said that the medical care market had failed because healthcare is not a simple product, like a box of screws, but is complex and subject to major information asymmetries as the healthcare professional will usually know more than the patient. This opens up the possibility of exploitation on many levels, with potential for adverse consequences, including iatrogenesis, as described by Ivan Illich2 in relation to excessive or inappropriate use and as set out by Julian Tudor Hart in his “inverse care law” relating to underuse: “The availability of good medical care tends to vary inversely with the need for …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £157 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£30 / $37 / €33 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.