Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles.
the resources tied up up in unfocussed breast screening are significant, radiologist and radiographer time being a potential redirection to benefit the whole NHS.
the potential of alternatives to radiation based screening, based upon genetics and cellular populations in serum warrent review as cost effective alternatives.
the debate within radiology has always been about mammographic radiation induced cancer and resource diversion; as much as other iatrogenic morbidity and the value of whole population screening versus cohort selection.
at a time of acute on chronic radiologist workforce restriction across the UK NHS this would be a timely debate.
let's hope politics responds openly and supports science over pride; times have moved on, knowledge is greater, different techniques now present, and decisions taken in the past based upon early trials have been superseded by experience.
and indeed the cohort of folk who missed being screened are a useful control group for VFM analysis, use it!