Rapid responses are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on thebmj.com. Although a selection of rapid responses will be included online and in print as readers' letters, their first appearance online means that they are published articles. If you need the url (web address) of an individual response, perhaps for citation purposes, simply click on the response headline and copy the url from the browser window. Letters are indexed in PubMed.
Prof McKee has been misled in stating that there is a target for rejecting appeals in application for personal independence payments (PIPs). This statement is untrue and if left uncorrected casts doubt on the impartiality of the appeals procedure. The appeals process is administered by Her Majesty's Courts & Tribunal Service. Appeals are heard by an independent Tribunal, with decisions based solely on the evidence presented by the DWP and the person making the appeal. The appellant is invited to provide further evidence to the tribunal either written or in person in support of their claim. There are no targets for the tribunal to accept or reject appeals, the decision is based purely on the merits of the case. Latest figures available indicate the majority of the appeals are successful.