Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles.
Prof McKee has been misled in stating that there is a target for rejecting appeals in application for personal independence payments (PIPs). This statement is untrue and if left uncorrected casts doubt on the impartiality of the appeals procedure. The appeals process is administered by Her Majesty's Courts & Tribunal Service. Appeals are heard by an independent Tribunal, with decisions based solely on the evidence presented by the DWP and the person making the appeal. The appellant is invited to provide further evidence to the tribunal either written or in person in support of their claim. There are no targets for the tribunal to accept or reject appeals, the decision is based purely on the merits of the case. Latest figures available indicate the majority of the appeals are successful.