Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. News & Views
  2. Changing how we think...
  3. Changing how we think about healthcare improvement
CCBYNC Open access
Analysis Quality Improvement

Changing how we think about healthcare improvement

BMJ 2018; 361 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2014 (Published 17 May 2018) Cite this as: BMJ 2018;361:k2014

Read the full collection

Related articles

EditorialCreating space for quality improvement
EditorialBetter healthcare must mean better for patients and carers
Editor's choiceThe complexities and successes of the NHS
Read more from our quality improvement series

See more

Cited by...

  • Factors that influence the implementation of (inter)nationally endorsed health and social care standards: a systematic review and meta-summary
  • Resilience perspective on healthcare professionals adaptations to changes and challenges resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic: a meta-synthesis
  • Implementation of consensus-based perioperative care pathways to reduce clinical variation for elective surgery in an Australian private hospital: a mixed-methods pre-post study protocol
  • Factors that influence the implementation of (inter)nationally endorsed health and social care standards: a systematic review and meta-summary
  • Early diagnosis of cancer: systems approach to support clinicians in primary care
  • Walking the line between assessment, improvement and learning: a qualitative study on opportunities and risks of incorporating peer discussion of audit and feedback within quality improvement in general practice
  • 'Beyond Places of Safety - a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England
  • Challenges in conducting quality improvement projects: reflections of a junior doctor
  • Protocol for establishing and evaluating a public and patient panel for organisation science and management principles in healthcare
  • Walking the line between assessment, improvement, and learning: an exploratory study on opportunities and risks of peer discussion of audit and feedback
  • Networks for future healthcare
  • Lessons in quality improvement
  • Improving transparent team communication with the 'Glass Door decal communication tool: a mixed methods analysis of family and staff perspectives
  • Impact on Mental, Physical and Cognitive functioning of a Critical care sTay during the COVID-19 pandemic (IMPACCT COVID-19): protocol for a prospective, multicentre, mixed-methods cohort study
  • Use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol
  • Priorities to improve the care for chronic conditions and multimorbidity: a survey of patients and stakeholders nested within the ComPaRe e-cohort
  • Evaluating quality improvement at scale: routine reporting for executive board governance in a UK National Health Service organisation
  • Strengthening citizenship: A healthcare improvement priority
  • Will a new NHS structure in England help recovery from the pandemic?
  • A qualitative exploration of patient flow in a developing Caribbean emergency department
  • Implementing large-system, value-based healthcare initiatives: a realist study protocol for seven natural experiments
  • Qualitative exploration of patient flow in a Caribbean emergency department
  • The compatibility of reductionistic and complexity approaches in a sociomedical innovation perspective
  • Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey
  • Use of compression therapy to treat lower limb wounds across Europe: a scoping review protocol
  • Patient feedback for safety improvement in primary care: results from a feasibility study
  • Built to last? The sustainability of healthcare system improvements, programmes and interventions: a systematic integrative review
  • Reclaiming the systems approach to paediatric safety
  • Children and Young Peoples Health Partnership (CYPHP) Evelina London model of care: protocol for an opportunistic cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) to assess child health outcomes, healthcare quality and health service use
  • Exploring the ripple effects of an Australian hospital redevelopment: a protocol for a longitudinal, mixed-methods study
  • How organisations contribute to improving the quality of healthcare
  • Engaging primary care physicians in system change - an interpretive qualitative study in a remote and rural health region in Northern British Columbia, Canada
  • in-DEPtH framework: evidence-informed, co-creation framework for the Design, Evaluation and Procurement of Health services
  • The iPROMOS protocol: a stepped-wedge study to implement routine patient-reported outcomes in a medical oncology outpatient setting
  • Using data for improvement
  • Research paradigm that tackles the complexity of in situ care: video reflexivity
  • Improving communication of patient issues on transfer out of intensive care
  • Making doctors better
  • The systems approach at the sharp end
  • Engineering safer care coordination from hospital to home: lessons from the USA
  • Lowering hospital walls to achieve health equity
  • Time to design a "real health system"
  • Creating space for quality improvement
Back to top